LISTENER

PAMELA S STEVENS

  • 22
  • reviews
  • 7
  • helpful votes
  • 22
  • ratings

waste of time and money

Overall
2 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 2020-01-02

Honestly, worst book ever. Ellen might as well read the phone book. That's how funny it is. I couldn't force myself to finish it.

Seriously, I love Ellen, but I'm not kidding, this book stinks.

not so great!

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
3 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 2019-08-15

I was expecting a story of love between the writer and a dog she got saddled with
I guess this is the story, but she doesn't give the dog much of a personality. Kind if boring.

very enjoyable

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 2019-08-03

I like this book a lot. the plot us good and kept my interest right through to the end.

Horrible!

Overall
1 out of 5 stars
Performance
1 out of 5 stars
Story
1 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 2019-07-28

OMG! Two hours into the book and he's still talking about freaking grapes at dinner! What a huge waste of time. I even sped it up to 1 and 1/4 speed. Didn't help. 4 hours left and I don't think I can make it. His kid is killing people and he's acting like he stole a chocolate bar! Then, he goes off on other crap that has nothing to do with the story. If it doesn't get a lot better by the time it's over, I will be very unhappy. One of the worst books I have ever read!
I've now finished the book. M review stands. Total waste of time! People say it's a thriller? I don't get it. An asshole raises an asshole and they thinkit's a thriller? The writer spent more time describing the food than the actual meat of the book. Total crap.

1 person found this helpful

too long

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
2 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 2019-07-22

Might have been an OK story, but it was way too long. I felt like that kid should have been an adult by the time the book was finished.

1 person found this helpful

not very good

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 2019-07-14

I had trouble hearing the narrator. she spoke too softly in parts and then too loud in others. I hot sick of the leading characters whining. by the end, I had had enough. I was anxious for it to end.

1 person found this helpful

Pretty Good Read

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
4 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 2019-05-04

I enjoyed tihs book. Quite the twist at the end which made it better. Narrator was good.

easy read

Overall
4 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
4 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 2019-04-26

this book was OK. not very exciting, but an easy read. I think it's not bad, but forgettable

not very exciting

Overall
3 out of 5 stars
Performance
2 out of 5 stars
Story
3 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 2019-04-20

I did not find this book very exciting. The narrator tried to use different voices for characters which I found very annoying. I enjoyed this authors other book much more

I really enjoyed this book

Overall
5 out of 5 stars
Performance
5 out of 5 stars
Story
5 out of 5 stars

Reviewed: 2019-04-05

This book not only talks about the camps, but also the experimental surgeries carried out on people. It gives the stories of 3 women, including the story of one of the doctors who was performing the surgeries. I found it very interesting and horrifying how someone can justify these actions.