Gratuit avec l'essai de 30 jours

  • Army Diplomacy

  • American Military Occupation and Foreign Policy After World War II
  • Auteur(s): Walter Hudson
  • Narrateur(s): Donnie Sipes
  • Durée: 12 h et 51 min
  • 4,0 out of 5 stars (1 évaluation)

Choisissez 1 livre audio par mois dans notre incomparable catalogue.
Écoutez à volonté des milliers de livres audio, de livres originaux et de balados.
Accédez à des promotions et à des soldes exclusifs.
L'abonnement Premium Plus se renouvelle automatiquement au tarif de 14,95 $/mois + taxes applicables après 30 jours. Annulation possible à tout moment.
Page de couverture de Army Diplomacy

Army Diplomacy

Auteur(s): Walter Hudson
Narrateur(s): Donnie Sipes
Essayer pour 0,00 $

14,95$ par mois après 30 jours. Annulable en tout temps.

Acheter pour 33,53$

Acheter pour 33,53$

Payer avec la carte finissant par
En confirmant votre achat, vous acceptez les conditions d'utilisation d'Audible et la déclaration de confidentialité d'Amazon. Des taxes peuvent s'appliquer.

Description

In the immediate aftermath of World War II, the United States Army became the principal agent of American foreign policy. The army designed, implemented, and administered the occupations of the defeated Axis powers Germany and Japan, as well as many other nations. Generals such as Lucius Clay in Germany, Douglas MacArthur in Japan, Mark Clark in Austria, and John Hodge in Korea presided over these territories as proconsuls. At the beginning of the Cold War, more than 300 million people lived under some form of US military authority. The army's influence on nation-building at the time was profound, but most scholarship on foreign policy during this period concentrates on diplomacy at the highest levels of civilian government rather than the armed forces' governance at the local level.

In Army Diplomacy, Hudson explains how US Army policies in the occupied nations represented the culmination of more than a century of military doctrine. Focusing on Germany, Austria, and Korea, Hudson's analysis reveals that while the post-World War II American occupations are often remembered as overwhelming successes, the actual results were mixed. His study draws on military sociology and institutional analysis as well as international relations theory to demonstrate how "bottom-up" decisions not only inform but also create higher-level policy.

©2015 The University Press of Kentucky (P)2016 Redwood Audiobooks

Ce que les critiques en disent

"A significant contribution to the literature on the U.S. Army's role in planning for and administering occupations." (Theodore A. Wilson, editor of Victory in Europe 1945: From World War to Cold War)
"A new and important interpretation of 'war termination,' something that challenges all victorious armies and governments." (Jonathan House, author of A Military History of the Cold War, 1944-1962)

Ce que les auditeurs disent de Army Diplomacy

Moyenne des évaluations de clients
Au global
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    0
  • 4 étoiles
    1
  • 3 étoiles
    0
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    0
Performance
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    0
  • 4 étoiles
    1
  • 3 étoiles
    0
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    0
Histoire
  • 4 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    0
  • 4 étoiles
    1
  • 3 étoiles
    0
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    0

Évaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.

Classer par :
Filtrer
  • Au global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    4 out of 5 stars
  • JJ
  • 2018-02-09

Interesting Topic

This book gives a good depiction of how the US government's military occupations of Germany and Austria were largely successful and why the Korean occupation was not so successful. It also talks more generally about the US military culture, doctrine and decision making around the governance of conquered foreign nations and the planning and educating of the military in that respect.

While very detailed around post WW2 and in to the 1950s, it largely glanced over how these doctrines apply to more modern conflicts (Iraq, North Korea, etc.). There was a brief mention at the end but I would have liked a little more modern analysis.

For someone who is interested in military history and US foreign relations, you may find it interesting but if you just want a history book it may be a tough listen. I found it read more the author’s doctoral dissertation than a typical history book, so be prepared for that.

Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.

Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.