Should we BAN Superintelligence? — Doom Debates: Tegmark vs. Ball (6-min summary)

Échec de l'ajout au panier.

Veuillez réessayer plus tard

Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.

Veuillez réessayer plus tard

Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.

Veuillez réessayer plus tard

Échec du suivi du balado

Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué

Should we BAN Superintelligence? — Doom Debates: Tegmark vs. Ball (6-min summary)

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails du balado

À propos de cet audio

A high-stakes clash over whether we should ban superintelligence and how fast policy must move to avoid catastrophe. In this 6-minute summary of a 2-hour Doom Debates episode, host Liron Shapira distills the core arguments from Max Tegmark and Dean Ball on AI risk, regulation, and democracy. You'll learn the competing views on existential risk (P-doom), the practicality of bans, FDA-style safety cases, tiered regulation, and the geopolitics of AI governance. Max Tegmark frames superintelligence as an existential threat that may need preemptive prohibition and quantitative safety benchmarks; Dean Ball pushes back on legal vagueness, regulatory capture, and the limits of predictability while endorsing adaptive, tiered rules. This concise breakdown highlights takeaways for policymakers, technologists, and anyone tracking AI safety, governance, and ethics. Listen now to get the key ideas in minutes.

Pas encore de commentaire