Obtenez votre premier livre audio gratuitement

Edge of Eternity

The Century Trilogy, Book 3
Auteur(s): Ken Follett
Narrateur(s): John Lee
Série: Century Trilogy, Livre 3
Durée: 36 h et 51 min
Catégories: Littérature, Historique
4.5 out of 5 stars (146 évaluations)

CDN$ 14,95 par mois; les 30 premiers jours sont gratuits. Annulable en tout temps.

Description

Edge of Eternity is the sweeping, passionate conclusion to Ken Follett's extraordinary historical epic, The Century Trilogy.

Throughout these books, Follett has followed the fortunes of five intertwined families - American, German, Russian, English, and Welsh - as they make their way through the twentieth century. Now they come to one of the most tumultuous eras of all: the enormous social, political, and economic turmoil of the 1960s through the 1980s, from civil rights, assassinations, mass political movements and Vietnam to the Berlin Wall, the Cuban Missile Crisis, presidential impeachment, revolution - and rock and roll.

East German teacher Rebecca Hoffman discovers she's been spied on by the Stasi for years and commits an impulsive act that will affect her family for the rest of their lives. George Jakes, the child of a mixed-race couple, bypasses a corporate law career to join Robert F. Kennedy's Justice Department, and finds himself in the middle not only of the seminal events of the civil rights battle, but a much more personal battle of his own. Cameron Dewar, the grandson of a senator, jumps at the chance to do some official and unofficial espionage for a cause he believes in, only to discover that the world is a much more dangerous place than he'd imagined. Dimka Dvorkin, a young aide to Nikita Khrushchev, becomes a prime agent both for good and for ill as the United States and the Soviet Union race to the brink of nuclear war, while his twin sister, Tania, carves out a role that will take her from Moscow to Cuba to Prague to Warsaw - and into history.

As always with Follett, the historical background is brilliantly researched and rendered, the action fast-moving, the characters rich in nuance and emotion. With the hand of a master, he brings us into a world we thought we knew but now will never seem the same again.

©2014 Ken Follett (P)2014 Penguin Audio
Ce que les membres d'Audible en pensent
Moyenne des évaluations de clients
Au global
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    115
  • 4 étoiles
    26
  • 3 étoiles
    4
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    1
Performance
  • 5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    116
  • 4 étoiles
    18
  • 3 étoiles
    2
  • 2 étoiles
    0
  • 1 étoile
    0
Histoire
  • 4.5 out of 5 stars
  • 5 étoiles
    105
  • 4 étoiles
    22
  • 3 étoiles
    8
  • 2 étoiles
    1
  • 1 étoile
    0

Évaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.

Trier :
Trier par:
  • Au global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars

Author's politics get in the way of the story

The first two novels were well researched historical fiction novels; this one seems more like a reflection of the authors political leaning through his life. The one main character with right of centre leanings is an unlikable character. This causes story issues as once he got to the Nixon-Ford era, he no longer had characters who were believable insiders. His solution to this was to jump over much of the Nixon era and focus only on Watergate. He did a similar thing with Reagan, having only a single major event from that era take place in the novel.
With how important to the story the assassinations of the 1960s were, it seems like a glaring omission as he misses the assassination attempt on Reagan, and oddly enough John Lennon's assassination, which likely would have greatly effected two main characters in the music business. Basically the first 60% of the novel is well researched and flows well, then the rest of it seems to jump around making the story harder to follow especially in audiobook form.
By skipping all the Republican eras he does a disservice to the story. The Cold War is a much longer period than each World War so its understandable that timeframes were accelerated to fit one novel, but the manor it was done in, turned many characters into unbelievable idealogues. This series would have been better served as a quartet with all the time frames covered.

3 les gens ont trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars

Best book of the trilogy.

I love this book. I think I like this book best because I’ve been alive for the majority of these events. I am most wish you would write another series based on the troubles in the Middle East that started almost to soon as this book ended. I would recommend this book, and this series, to anybody who likes history. It is well researched, information packet, and has characters that you come to love.

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars

what an ending

a great capstone to an amazing trilogy. the reader, the narrative, all a+ in my book

1 personne a trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    4 out of 5 stars

Entertaining, but not as good as the first two.

John Lee is a fantastic reader who really brings the characters to life. Ken Follet does a great job of mixing history and fiction.

  • Au global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars

Excellent series

Thoroughly enjoyed the story and for the most part the performance. My only complaint would be that when John Lee portrays the women characters he makes them sound like breathless airheads. It took me until the last book to figure out what was bothering me. Other than that his accents are very good and so is the reading.

  • Au global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars

Excellent trilogy

Excellent book to close of the series - however, this one was a tad heavy with the sex scenes. Otherwise, fantastic.

  • Au global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars

EPIC!

Hats off to the brilliant Ken Follett & superb John Lee for the conclusion of this marvellous trilogy.

  • Au global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars

Moving and a Great Story

The 3rd in the trilogy and the third very long book and still I didn't want it to end.

  • Au global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars

excellent final installment.

great book, as always

download quality was sketchy though which disrupted the flow a few times.

  • Au global
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    5 out of 5 stars

wonderful

Finishing the series saddened me because I can no longer visit with these characters daily anymore. The series was well written and the narrator was awesome to listen to.

Trier :
Trier par:
  • Au global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Daniel McAfee
  • 2014-11-14

Disappointing End to the Trilogy

I very much enjoyed the first two book in this trilogy. The thing that made the first two books so good is exactly what made the last book so poor - CHARACTER DEVELOPMENT!

It is simply amazing to me how this happened. The initial characters, who were obviously the parents and grand parents of the characters in the final book, were simply swept to the side, and the new characters were simply introduced as if their characters were already defined by the parents and grand parents.

Likewise, there was no real story line outside of the activities surrounding the historical events that occurred through the timeline of this third edition.

I am a HUGE fan of Follett and will anxiously await his next book. If you are a Follett fan, you still have to listen or read the trilogy. It's worth it, but keep in mind the last book just goes through the motions. I would also recommend any of his other books, most of all the Pillars and World without End books.

John Lee is masterful as always, truly one of the best narrators in the business.

14 les gens ont trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Elisa
  • 2014-09-22

Some good, some bad

Would you try another book from Ken Follett and/or John Lee?

Yes.

What was the most interesting aspect of this story? The least interesting?

Interesting to have the various simultaneous historical streams, but the dialog was terrible, most of the (excessive) sex scenes cringe-worthy, and the characters and situations (apart from historical ones) very contrived. I almost felt bad for the narrator, having to keep a straight "face" while reading some of the scenes.

Have you listened to any of John Lee’s other performances before? How does this one compare?

I think he did well, considering the material. He's a very good reader in general, but there were parts of this book that were not meant to be read by him.

Was Edge of Eternity worth the listening time?

I would have cut parts of the book, or at least edited it. Having to listen to contrived situations and unnatural sex scenes got old after a while, but it's hard to skip because the story moves fast.

Any additional comments?

More amusing than a history book, but definitely not a literary novel.Also, some of the characters change personality too much, or simply disappear without notice, throughout the saga.

53 les gens ont trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars
  • MICHAEL H
  • 2014-09-26

Weakest of Trilogy

I have been anxiously awaiting this third book of what had been a great series. I have read everything written by Ken Follett and loved them. I was severely disappointed by this book. It not only did not have the interesting characters that made the prior two books great, the stories not very engaging and dragged. Whereas I had trouble putting down the prior books, I could not wait to reach the end of this one.
I was very disappointed. If this were the first Ken Follett book that I read, I would not have gotten any others.

89 les gens ont trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Simone
  • 2014-10-06

Borderline Trashy

For a story I can say I liked, I have a lot of complaints.

Something bothered me about the book… I can’t quite put my finger on it, but if I could I would have to wash it. It felt so 80s to me and I am not sure I can explain that sentiment. Is it because it was in the 80s that first read sweeping dramatic sagas written by Judith Krantz and Barbara Taylor Bradford? Normally Ken Follett’s books are great, but this one was borderline trashy.

Here are my top 2 complaints:

1 – It’s just too long. I didn’t feel that way with Books 1 and 2 (perhaps because the events are closer in time to my reality and therefore more interesting by default) but on so many occasions I felt like it was dragging on with pointless scenes and I often found myself wondering what was the point? It was as if he was writing just for the pleasure of it, as opposed to advancing the story.

2 – The Sex. Dear Lord! Ken Follett just needs to write a dirty book and get it out of his system. Skimming over other reader’s reviews, I see I am in the majority on this one. It was so gratuitous and cringe-worthy that it became simply ridiculous. Every single scene winds up with someone in the sac, or talking about it, or fantasising about it, or reminiscing about it, or planning it, or being coy and alluding to how much (and how hard) they want it. I felt like the actual story was just filler to get to yet another sex scene. It was awkward after a while and extremely tiresome.

This book could have used a strong and merciless edit to cut it down to half the length, then it would have been a page-turner!

38 les gens ont trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    1 out of 5 stars
  • KATHLEEN S ANDERSON
  • 2019-04-12

What a disappointment

When I began this trilogy, I had such high hopes. Fall of Giants was an excellent book. The characters were richly developed and their stories kept me captivated. I felt I learned more about World War I and the Russian revolution than I ever had in school.

Winter of the World was a worthy follow up. World War II stories are a passion of mine, so I looked forward to following the characters from the first novel and their children through the turmoil of Nazi Germany and its aftermath. I found the characters were still interesting, and the story was historically accurate, but I began to notice the author's political views seeping into the story. It was a distraction, but not so much that I didn't enjoy the book.

But Edge of Eternity was a huge disappointment. The author's personal political beliefs completely overshadowed the story. Development of the new generation of characters was almost non-existent. And worse, the author's revisionist version of historical events was beyond the pale. Other than the acknowledgement of Jack Kennedy's womanizing, you would have thought the Kennedy brothers were saints sent directly from heaven to save America. Every conservative in the story is portrayed as an evil racist buffoon, and while every liberal character in the story is constantly having sex, the only conservative non-historical character in the book can't get laid by anyone but massage parlor prostitutes. President Carter's entire tenure of office is glossed over in about 15 minutes, and there is not a single mention of the terrible economy, lines at the gas pumps, or the Iran Hostage Crisis. President Reagan is actually called a mass murder several times. He receives zero credit for the fall of communism in eastern Europe - the author gives all credit to the Gorbachev and makes him out as a hero. George H.W. Bush was portrayed as a bumbling idiot, and it is implied that Hezbollah terrorism was actually caused by American and Israeli aggression.

Unlike the periods covered in the first two books, I lived through the 70s and 80s, and I found the author's portrayal of the times and the historical figures during these times to be disingenuous and despicable. I have enjoyed other works of historical fiction by this author, but this one really turned me off, and I'm not sure I'll try any other books of modern fiction by him. I would much rather find other authors who can tell a historical story without spinning it to suit their personal politics.

7 les gens ont trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars
  • warren
  • 2014-09-26

Good thing this isn't Follett's 1st novel.

I felt I was watching a version of Forrest Gump where we follow the girlfriend Jenny Curran and her messed up life.
I've always thought Follett was fair with all characters but, this book is just over the top. Over half the book is getting through the Kennedys.
Reagan funds terrorism and is a murderer, in fact, all republicans, the CIA, the FBI and military are the bad guys. The heroes are journalist, lawyers and rock stars. Thatcher doesn't even get mentioned. Gorbachev and the price of oil ended the USSR. I could go on and on about huge events that were ignored but Follett fans are going to buy this just as I did.
The only redeeming part is the wrapping up of the trilogy.

70 les gens ont trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    4 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Ursula
  • 2014-09-25

Disappointed

Would you try another book from Ken Follett and/or John Lee?

I'm not sure. I really liked the first two and I was looking forward to this one. But I don't think it measures up to the others.

Has Edge of Eternity turned you off from other books in this genre?

No, not at all. I like the genre very much.

Which scene was your favorite?

Martin Luther King's meeting with George

Was Edge of Eternity worth the listening time?

Mmm. Well, some of the time. But I wanted it to get better and it didn't. There was such an opportunity to tell this story well but there were quite a few discrepancies.

Example: "the FDP was not socialist like the SPD" when the FDP was a lot more liberal leaning.

The parts about East Germany. I was in East Germany several times as a child. My parents couldn't afford camp in the West, so I went to the camp in the East. Lots of love and good food is what I remember. It's a bit one-sided. I also know a lot of "Fluechtlinge" (refugees) from the East and they didn't always have an easy time.

Maybe I didn't like it as much because this was "my" times and I was so familiar with the happenings.

Any additional comments?

The performer has a very nice voice and reads well. However, his accents are not always on the mark. Particularly, the Maryland and DC accents are way to southern.

What really turned me off were the sex scenes every few minutes. They really didn't add anything to the story and just made me cringe. I won't even mention the Kennedy affair. We all know it went on but it was just a bit much.

11 les gens ont trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    1 out of 5 stars
  • cristina
  • 2014-11-03

Write By Numbers

SO incredibly disappointing. At first I was OK with listening to the ridiculously trivialized view of history, but then it got simply BORING. To be honest, I have a mere 45 minutes left to listen to and I had to go off and read a 'real' book. ZERO character development: The thing that made Follett's previous pseudo-historical pieces fun was that the characters seemed to come to life. NONE of that here. The characters are cartoon stereotypes who are obviously 'acting' with the benefit of historical hindsight. ZERO subtlety, Mr. Follett. Did you have interns write this or did you simply phone it it? (And ZERO plot: A fast-forward through the last century's main events with the characters--every single one of them--having inane discussions or thoughts about the other characters' butts or nipples or the possibility of sleeping with them...even as cataclysmic events are supposedly taking place.) #ACartoon

40 les gens ont trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    1 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    5 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    2 out of 5 stars
  • Scott
  • 2014-10-03

EXTREMELY Disappointing

I loved the first two installments of this series and could not wait for the final chapter to be released. I pre-ordered the Edge of Eternity and dove in on the day it was released. The first two books made you deeply connected to a fantastic cast of characters and provided a history lesson wrapped in a captivating set of story lines.

Edge of Eternity unfortunately goes off the rails because of a clear and frustrating political bias. The agenda is so transparent and angry that it not only makes the book difficult to listen to at times but the anti-republican bias leads to a disjointed read. The author goes so far out of his way to take shots at conservatives and ignore any possible positives stemming from the actions of players like GW Bush, Ronald Reagan, and Richard Nixon that the book ignores relevant events. I don't enjoy overt bias from Republicans or Democrats. I feel that it takes away from the experience and, in my opinion, it all but destroys this book and spoils the series. I gave the first two books five stars. This installment will get one star from me.

As an example, the Berlin Wall plays a prominent part in the book but never once does the book mention Reagan's demand that Mikhail Gorbachev tear down the wall. As a matter of fact, as you read you will learn that not only did Reagan and Bush have nothing to do with the fall of communism (according to Follett's book it was the media and liberals in the US but the real hero was Gorbachev) but they had to be stage managed in order not to destroy the world and it is in spite of them and their foolishness that the iron curtain came down.

You will also hear Reagan referred to as a mass murderer several times while middle eastern terrorists are painted as reluctant men simply retaliating for American atrocities. Nixon at least is portrayed as a fumbling criminal (not completely untrue) but Reagan receives much harsher treatment.

The book has other flaws. The majority of the characters are rich and famous. Those that aren't rich and famous are powerful players on the international political scene. It reaches a point where you simply cannot suspend disbelief. The only characters that do not end up super successful are those with a conservative bent. They are miserable, bitter, petty and even evil. Every Vietnam era soldier written about is a criminal the commits rape and murder while the courageous actress who poses on a enemy tank is penned as a heroic figure.

It's all just a bit much. I don't bother reading books that vilify liberals and I dearly wish this book didn't go out the way to make devils of all conservatives. John Lee does a brilliant job as always. I gave him five stars. Sorry if this turned into a rant but I am deeply disappointed by a book I looked forward to for so long.

135 les gens ont trouvé cela utile

  • Au global
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Performance
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Histoire
    3 out of 5 stars
  • Jennifer
  • 2014-09-29

Meh

As this story entered a more modern era, so did many unnecessary descriptions of sexual encounters.It didn't add much to the story line. It was interesting to learn from a different perspective the political machinations behind the actual historical events of the last 30 or so years. As much as I have liked the story lines of this series of three books, I am not enthralled with the author's writing ability. He overuses the literary device of questioning a character's motives and choices. The narrator doesn't help here by stating these questions as expository statements as opposed to the questions they are intended to represent. E.g. "what was he to do?" over and over and over stated as a sentence and not as an actual question.

15 les gens ont trouvé cela utile