Obtenez 3 mois à 0,99 $/mois + 20 $ de crédit Audible

OFFRE D'UNE DURÉE LIMITÉE
Page de couverture de Minority Viewpoint: My Experience

Minority Viewpoint: My Experience

As a Person of Color - With the American Justice System

Aperçu
En profiter Essayer pour 0,00 $
L'offre prend fin le 1 décembre 2025 à 23 h 59, HP.
Abonnez-vous à Audible pour 0,99 $/mois pendant les 3 premiers mois et obtenez un crédit de 20 $ en prime sur Audible.ca. La notification de crédit sera envoyée par courriel.
1 nouveauté ou titre populaire à choisir chaque mois – ce titre vous appartiendra.
L'écoute illimitée des milliers de livres audio, de balados et de titres originaux inclus.
L'abonnement se renouvelle automatiquement au tarif de 0,99 $/mois pendant 3 mois, et au tarif de 14,95 $/mois ensuite. Annulation possible à tout moment.
Choisissez 1 livre audio par mois dans notre incomparable catalogue.
Écoutez à volonté des milliers de livres audio, de livres originaux et de balados.
L'abonnement Premium Plus se renouvelle automatiquement au tarif de 14,95 $/mois + taxes applicables après 30 jours. Annulation possible à tout moment.

Minority Viewpoint: My Experience

Auteur(s): Sumi Mukherjee
Narrateur(s): Mel Konn
En profiter Essayer pour 0,00 $

14,95 $/mois après 3 mois. L'offre prend fin le 1 décembre 2025 à 23 h 59, HP. Annulation possible à tout moment.

14,95$ par mois après 30 jours. Annulable en tout temps.

Acheter pour 25,00 $

Acheter pour 25,00 $

À propos de cet audio

Through this remarkable true account story the author has tried to bring up and discuss a number of issues focusing on “Justice in America - is it truly for everyone?”

Why would a hotel worker include fabricated and unsubstantiated statements in a report to the police about a guest of color? Is this racially motivated?

Why would a hotel owner laugh about a sincere complaint made by a guest of color after promising that he would follow up on the complaint? Could this be racially motivated?

Is it okay for a hotel worker to add unproven and untrue, defamatory statements about a guest of color to the police so they would investigate the guest for a possible serious crime?

Why would a renowned hotel support such egregious behavior by one of its employees against a guest of color?

What does a client do when he detects several errors and omissions on the part of his lawyer?

Why is an honest evaluation of a lawyer’s performance not welcomed by the legal community?

Why would a law firm not expect the utmost professionalism and competence from their highly paid lawyers?

Does the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board truly care about the impact of a lawyer’s actions or inactions on the clients?

Why is it okay for a police officer to allegedly associate a specific named person of color with a horrible crime (with no truth to it whatsoever) and use it as a so called “scare tactic”?

Is it okay for a police officer to allegedly use a name simply because it is not a common name? Is that not racially motivated?

©2020 Crimson Sparrow (P)2021 Crimson Sparrow
Droit Liberté et sécurité Politique Crime
Pas encore de commentaire