
Nuclear War
A Scenario
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Acheter pour 26,22 $
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Annie Jacobsen
-
Auteur(s):
-
Annie Jacobsen
À propos de cet audio
The INSTANT New York Times bestseller
Instant Los Angeles Times bestseller
One of NPR's Books We Love
One of Newsweek Staffers' Favorite Books of the Year
Shortlisted for the Baillie Gifford Prize
“In Nuclear War: A Scenario, Annie Jacobsen gives us a vivid picture of what could happen if our nuclear guardians fail…Terrifying.”—Wall Street Journal
There is only one scenario other than an asteroid strike that could end the world as we know it in a matter of hours: nuclear war. And one of the triggers for that war would be a nuclear missile inbound toward the United States.
Every generation, a journalist has looked deep into the heart of the nuclear military establishment: the technologies, the safeguards, the plans, and the risks. These investigations are vital to how we understand the world we really live in—where one nuclear missile will beget one in return, and where the choreography of the world’s end requires massive decisions made on seconds’ notice with information that is only as good as the intelligence we have.
Pulitzer Prize finalist Annie Jacobsen’s Nuclear War: A Scenario explores this ticking-clock scenario, based on dozens of exclusive new interviews with military and civilian experts who have built the weapons, have been privy to the response plans, and have been responsible for those decisions should they have needed to be made. Nuclear War: A Scenario examines the handful of minutes after a nuclear missile launch. It is essential reading, and unlike any other book in its depth and urgency.
©2024 Penguin Audio (P)2024 Annie JacobsenCe que les critiques en disent
“Gripping . . . essential if you want to understand the complex and disturbing details that go into a civilization-destroying decision to drop the Bomb on an enemy. . . . Jacobsen has done her homework. She has spent more than a decade interviewing dozens of experts while mastering the voluminous literature on the subject, some of it declassified only in recent years.”—New York Times Book Review
“Timeless, masterful. . .A stomach-clenching, multi-perspective, ticking-clock, geopolitical thriller. Jacobsen expertly delivers a madman’s portrait of Armageddon, one made all the more impactful by the thought that it could literally occur at any moment. Almost novel-like in its presentation, Nuclear War: A Scenario represents the equivalent of an existential gut punch, a sickening and necessary reminder of how fragile every 21st century convenience becomes in the face of a blinding flash of light and near-instantaneous shockwave. Exhaustively researched and featuring interviews with professionals who truly understand just how close we continue to creep toward thermonuclear annihilation Nuclear War: A Scenario should be required reading for everyone alive today, especially for the politicians and policymakers who literally hold the precarious fate of our species in their hands.”—Forbes
“At once methodical and vivid. In documenting the minutiae of the apocalypse, the writing is redolent of 'Hiroshima', a seminal article by John Hersey published in the New Yorker in 1946.”—The Economist
Incredibly effective in its goal
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
I learned alot!
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
Sobering, incredible, horrifying
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
Riveting and horrifying
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
A shocking and poignant account of nuclear war
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
That Voice.
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
Truly Horrifying
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
Compelling. Important. Terrifying.
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
1. Radars can see beyond the horizon
2. Quite possibly most of the Nuclear club members got "EMP satellites" despite "no nukes in space" treaty. It is also possible that EMP weapons will be used first.
3. "Ohio-Trident-II" SLBMs will likely use flat trajectory.
4. Both cruise missiles and anti-missile missiles can be equipped with nuclear warheads and used for the first strike as well as to deal with enemy's AA (Europe is full of those, guess what would be the target?) Guess why Russia invaded Ukraine (after Ukrainian president declared joining NATO and placing such missiles 300 miles away from Moscow)?
5. The terrifying Russian Cobalt Nuke sea drone weapons are not mentioned.
6. The MERV story might not be entirely correct: what about the START treaty?
7. The "unreasonable" North Korean leader is US-educated and arguably the best of the bunch (comparing to his dad and grandpa).
8. Russians would call first and launch if no one is picking up the phone?
9. Russians or Chinese are likely to attempt shutting down that missile before US tries to do the same.
10. According to some sources, the preparation of the biological war on Russia is true with many tests performed on population of former Soviet republics, surrounding Russia.
11. Watching News is called OSINT :-) (the important part is to see how exactly they would "cover the story" or rather lie about something).
12. Could it be that "NATO for peace and democracy" is an oxymoron? I mean shouldn't we be asking people of Korea, China, Vietnam, Cambodia, Angola, Nicaragua, Chile, Granada, Serbia, Iraq, Afganistan, Libya, Belarus, UKRAINE, Russia and many other nations of what they think about that "peace" thing?
Redacted Common Sense
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
In particular, when discussing the impacts of an EMP attack, the author makes claims about how systems such as elevators in high rose buildings would be impacted, and they clearly did not research these details as they have made inaccurate claims. While there is chance of total apocalyptic full nuclear exchange, it's more likely that more of the systems will not operate as expected when so much of its reliability is counting on humans to behave as predicted.
The idea that the US or Russia would launch everything in their nuclear arsenals at each other when the initial attack came out of the blue and both sides know it was a third-party is very hard to swallow. Facts of continuity of government, and launch control mechanisms are very interesting and sources are credible.
I rate this 4 out of 5.
very detailed and well researched yet still hard to believe.
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.