Article 19. Algorithmic System Reviews: Substantive vs. Controls Testing
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Article 19. Algorithmic System Reviews: Substantive vs. Controls Testing
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
Spoken by a human version of this article.
- Knowing the basics of substantive testing vs. controls testing can help you determine if the review will meet your needs.
- Substantive testing directly identifies errors or unfairness, while controls testing evaluates governance effectiveness. The results/conclusions are different.
- Understanding these differences can also help you anticipate the extent of your team's involvement during the review process.
Links
This article details a (largely) substantive testing method for accuracy reviews.
About this podcast
A podcast for Financial Services leaders, where we discuss fairness and accuracy in the use of data, algorithms, and AI.
Hosted by Yusuf Moolla.
Produced by Risk Insights (riskinsights.com.au).
Ce que les auditeurs disent de Article 19. Algorithmic System Reviews: Substantive vs. Controls Testing
Moyenne des évaluations de clientsÉvaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.
Il n'y a pas encore de critiques pour ce titre.