Article 20. Algorithm Reviews: Public vs Private Reports
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Article 20. Algorithm Reviews: Public vs Private Reports
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
Spoken (by a human) version of this article.
- Public AI audit reports aren't universally required; they mainly apply to high-risk applications and/or specific jurisdictions.
- The push for transparency primarily concerns independent audits, not internal reviews.
- Prepare by implementing ethical AI practices and conducting regular reviews.
Note: High-risk AI systems in banking and insurance are subject to specific requirements
Links
- AI and algorithm audit guidelines vary widely and are not universally applicable. We discussed this in a previous article, outlining how the appropriateness of audit guidance depends on your circumstances.
- Audit vs Review: we explored this topic in depth in a previous article.
About this podcast
A podcast for Financial Services leaders, where we discuss fairness and accuracy in the use of data, algorithms, and AI.
Hosted by Yusuf Moolla.
Produced by Risk Insights (riskinsights.com.au).
Ce que les auditeurs disent de Article 20. Algorithm Reviews: Public vs Private Reports
Moyenne des évaluations de clientsÉvaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.
Il n'y a pas encore de critiques pour ce titre.