Bigfoot Blitz: FBI Files, Post-It Man, and the Science of Sasquatch Hunters
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
Bigfoot's been having quite the week in the news cycle, folks. The biggest story making waves is that the FBI finally declassified its official Bigfoot file, and yes, you read that right—the Bureau actually investigated Sasquatch back in the seventies. Popular Mechanics broke the story on November 24th, revealing 22 pages of documentation from 1976 to 1977 exchanges between Oregon's Bigfoot Information Center and the FBI's Scientific and Technical Services Division. Director Peter Byrne sent the feds about 15 hairs attached to a small piece of skin after major newspapers like the New York Times and Washington Star-News started covering alleged Sasquatch evidence. The FBI lab, usually focused on criminal investigations, agreed to analyze the sample. The results? Total disappointment for believers. The Bureau concluded the hairs were from the deer family, not our legendary forest friend. But here's where it gets interesting—the very fact that the FBI released these files has sparked speculation that Bigfoot might actually be dead, since the Bureau typically doesn't go public with documents until after the subject passes away.
Meanwhile, social media's been buzzing with fresh activity. An Instagram post from November 25th by Americares jokingly announced that Bigfoot's been bumped from the front page, replaced by a new legend called Post-It Man. Various Bigfoot enthusiast accounts continue posting regularly, with one November 29th post tagged with hashtags like bigfoot, sasquatch, and bigfootsighting, keeping the community engaged.
From an academic angle, Popular Science just published research from Cardiff University and Sheffield University social scientists who spent three years interviewing over 150 Bigfoot hunters. Their findings suggest most cryptozoologists aren't crackpots—they're actually employing legitimate scientific methods including thermal imaging, drones, and audio equipment. Researcher Jamie Lewis noted that Bigfooters demonstrate skillful behavior in detecting and analyzing traces of undiscovered animals.
The broader narrative here shows Bigfoot existing simultaneously as both a cryptozoological mystery and a cultural phenomenon that genuinely organizes thousands of Americans' lives around evidence collection and analysis. Whether that's compelling proof of existence or proof of human creativity remains entirely dependent on your perspective.
Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta
This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI
Pas encore de commentaire