California Tax Litigation: Nexus Battles, Retroactive Laws, and Apportionment Disputes
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
California Tax Litigation: Nexus Battles, Retroactive Laws, and Apportionment Disputes
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
In this episode of the SALTovation Podcast, Meredith Smith and Stacey Roberts continue their conversation with Michael Cataldo on the complex world of California tax litigation. They discuss pivotal topics such as distinguishing between business and non-business income, the impact of the throwout rule, and the intricacies of alternative apportionment.
Their conversation reveals how even a minor entry on a tax return can trigger significant consequences, from audits to penalties, and the importance of carefully reviewing tax software defaults, as relying solely on automated systems can lead to costly errors.
Key Takeaways:
- Early identification of potential tax issues can prevent audits and penalties.
- Differentiating between business and non-business income is critical in California tax filings.
- Understanding the throwout rule and alternative apportionment strategies can impact tax outcomes.
- Reliance on tax software defaults without careful review can lead to costly errors.
Connect
Subscribe on your favorite podcast app here.
Follow us on LinkedIn and YouTube.
Mentioned in this episode:
Introductory Call
Introductory Call