Send us a text

What if we judged vices by impact instead of labels? We kick off with an unflinching look at cocaine alongside alcohol, weed, sugar, gambling, and porn, and ask a harder question: are you functioning, or is the vice running your life? From there, we grapple with legality versus morality and how the loudest opinions often punish optics instead of outcomes. It’s not about normalizing harm; it’s about being honest and consistent.

That honesty takes us through a risky media “experiment” thought experiment, and into a critique of the spectacle economy that rewards clips over rigor. We unpack the Diddy documentary as a case study in power, image, and control, and then confront “snitch” culture head-on. If the evidence is public, is curation ratting, or are we avoiding accountability by shaming messengers more than offenders? We challenge the idea of exporting street codes to the mainstream when the streets promise poverty, death, and prison—not a life worth modeling.

Sports becomes the mirror. We vent about the Falcons—a franchise trapped in false starts and QB purgatory—and contrast that with fantasy football’s clean incentives. Then we go deep on college football’s broken design: TV-driven calendars, automatic bids that ignore quality, and portal timing that punishes both integrity and academics. We argue for a student-first schedule, smarter guardrails for NIL and transfers, and fewer corporate finance tricks shaping the sport. Bigger brackets won’t fix a system built on perverse incentives; better structure will.

We close on consequences and choice through the Michigan coaching fallout: don’t mix power and romance at work, and if you do, own the decision instead of letting secrecy burn lives. Across every topic, the throughline is clear—set values, measure impact, and accept the cost. If that framework makes sense to you, hit follow, share this with a friend, and drop a review with the one change you’d make to college football right now.

Support the show