
Day 49: Sprinting Through the Methodologies: Agile vs. Waterfall for QA
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
Welcome to "QA in a Box"! In this episode, "Sprinting Through the Methodologies: Agile vs. Waterfall for QA!", join host Chris Ryan on Day 49 of the series as he unpacks the two heavyweight contenders of software development: Agile and Waterfall.
Discover the pros and cons of each methodology from a Quality Assurance perspective. Chris, along with insights from the enigmatic Podcast CTO and practical wisdom from Project Lead Karen Mallory in "Karen's Corner," explores how Waterfall's sequential phases and fixed requirements contrast with Agile's rapid, iterative sprints and collaborative approach.
Learn why Waterfall's late-stage testing can lead to costly fixes, while Agile's early and continuous feedback empowers QA teams and fosters a "whole team" approach to quality. Karen offers invaluable advice on embracing collaboration and smart automation regardless of your chosen methodology.
Finally, hear the verdict on which approach truly reigns supreme for QA, and get answers to listener questions, including advice for transitioning to Agile and some truly hilarious bug stories. Tune in to understand how these methodologies impact your QA journey and how to elevate your role from detective to quality architect. "QA in a Box" is where we unpack quality, one sprint at a time!