Debate: Is AI an Existential Risk to Humanity?
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Debate: Is AI an Existential Risk to Humanity?
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
Welcome to our first episode of Season 2 of Reinforcement Talking, UCL AI Society's Podcast!
This episode is an audio version of our recent AI Debate. It's difficult to think of a question with higher stakes. Some AI experts like Geoffrey Hinton think that AI should be considered just as risky as pandemics or nuclear war; others, like Melanie Mitchell, see the risks as vanishingly small.
It was a pleasure to host 4 experts on this topic, including
- Reuben Adams, a UCL AI PhD student
- Chris Watkins, Professor in Computer Science at Royal Holloway
- Jack Stilgoe, a Science Technology Professor at UCL
- Kenneth Cukier, Deputy Executive Editor at The Economist.
If you'd prefer to watch the YouTube version, here's the link.
Ce que les auditeurs disent de Debate: Is AI an Existential Risk to Humanity?
Moyenne des évaluations de clientsÉvaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.
Il n'y a pas encore de critiques pour ce titre.