Did The Supreme Court Get It Right Ruling In Favor of Presidential Immunity?
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Did The Supreme Court Get It Right Ruling In Favor of Presidential Immunity?
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
In a historic decision, the Supreme Court ruled that former presidents have at least some immunity from criminal prosecution for “official acts” in office, no matter their “politics, policy, or party,” but stipulated that that protection doesn't cover everything. Should presidents be immune?
Host: Gerard Ramalho
Guests: Paul Padda, Paul Padda Law & David Orentlicher, Dir., UNLV Boyd School of Law
Pas encore de commentaire