
Episode 115: Traditional Gender Roles (Our Thoughts)
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
“If we don’t define roles with love, we inherit them with resentment.”
We got fired up by a viral reel floating around online recently…
A young man was proudly sharing how he wants to “provide” for his woman—so she can spend her days going on “hot girl walks” and avoid life’s challenges.
Sweet, right?
Kind of…
Because in the same breath, he spoke about how men desire a woman who is “relaxed” and “calm” at the end of the day.
Aka:
“I’ll provide for you… as long as you behave.”
“I’ll give you a comfortable life… as long as you make mine easy.”
That’s not real provision.
That’s control disguised as care.
That’s conditional love dressed up as devotion.
So yeah… we had a LOT to say. And we recorded a whole episode unpacking it.
🔥 Here’s What We Dive Into:
- Why that viral reel about “providing for a woman” sparked something in us
- Self-serving provision vs. provision rooted in devotion & love
- When providership can be used to control a woman
- The difference between financial provision & emotional provision
- What a deep woman is truly yearning for
- How we personally navigate gender roles in our relationship
- And so much more.
This one’s big. Let’s go there.
🔥 Love this episode?
Don't forget to subscribe and share your thoughts in a review. We love hearing from our listeners!
🔥 Let's stay connected:
Follow Meg: @the.meg.o
Follow Jacob: @thejacoboneill
Follow the podcast: @sexloveandeverythinginbetween
🔥 Want more?
⚡ Grab our relationship freebie: https://meg-oneill.com/relationship-freebie
⚡ Join CLAIMED: https://meg-oneill.com/claimed-immersion
⚡ Join DESIRE DATE: https://meg-oneill.com/desire-date
Ready to dive deeper?
We work with individuals and couples - slide into our DMs to learn more!