Episode 5: The Delphi Murders: Justice, Science, and the Shadows of Doubt
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
In this episode, Natalie and Katrina explore the Delphi murders and how forensic science shaped the case against Richard Allen. They break down the limits of firearm and toolmark analysis, why “ballistics matches” aren’t always scientifically certain, and how flawed forensic methods have led to wrongful convictions across the U.S.
Learn more:
🔬 **Forensic Ballistics Science**
NIJ: Firearm and Toolmark Identification (https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/firearm-and-toolmark-identification)
National Academy of Sciences (2009) Report (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK220360/)
⚖️ **Wrongful Convictions & Forensic Errors**
Innocence Project (https://innocenceproject.org/unvalidated-or-improper-forensic-science/)
National Registry of Exonerations (https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/forensics.aspx)
Follow Justice Seekers Podcast for more true cases, legal insights, and the stories behind forensic evidence in American courts.
📱 @JusticeSeekersPodcast | 📩 JusticeSeekersPodcast@gmail.com
Mixed & Edited by Next Day Podcast
info@nextdaypodcast.com