Fixing Common ERM Challenges
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
New website = RiskCommentary.ca
ERM mid-life crisis: how to rejuvenate and validate the program.
- The curious juxtaposition of need vs poor take-up.
- Steps in analyzing and fixing poor take-up in ERM programs.
- Several specific fixes for improving the compelling nature of risk information.
- What about “opportunity”? Ref: Innovation.
- What about other risk management sub-disciplines?
- Return to first principles in planning and HQRA.
- Review again the principles of program success (Ep 15).
KEY QUOTE
“The result [of High Quality Risk Assessment] is a body of risk information that is fresh and revelatory, leading to problem solving. When that happens at your risk ID session, it is unmistakable. People see the logic of the method and acknowledge that it is working.”
LINKS
Free introductory course: Innovation: How Can My Organization Get Started?
(E. Robertson 2016) Solving the Enterprise Risk Management Puzzle: Secrets to Successful Implementation
Pas encore de commentaire