Épisodes

  • They Weren't Dying of COVID: A System Built to Kill | Ken McCarthy

    They Weren't Dying of COVID: A System Built to Kill | Ken McCarthy
    Jan 5 2026
    McCarthy is the author of the book 'What the Nurses Saw.' I asked him: "What do you think: In 50 years and 100 years, will anybody know that this happened?" This is the first part of a three part interview with author Ken McCarthy about his book "What the Nurses Saw: An Investigation Into Systemic Medical Murders That Took Place in Hospitals During the COVID Panic and the Nurses Who Fought Back to Save Their Patients." McCarthy, who became known in the 1990s for commercializing the internet and making crucial contributions to the development of online marketing, told me: "Specifically in the US, they incentivized a protocol which virtually guaranteed that people that came to the hospital with respiratory problems were going to die. Not everyone died, but over a million people died in US hospitals." And he adds: "It was systematized and it was incentivized by the federal government of the United States." One of the people that McCarthy interviewed for his book was AJ DePriest, a medical administrator and researcher who followed the money trail that led to the death of so many Americans. DePriest told him about the waivers that most people do not know about to this day. She told him that "CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) issued a series of waivers in early 2020 that allowed hospitals to do things for which they would have been sued and had the funding guts ripped out of them if they had done these things before COVID." What kind of things did these waivers enable the hospitals to do? For example hiring doctors and nurses for ICU units who were in no way qualified to work there. Or banning family members from visiting their loved ones. Or suspending the Patients' Bill of Rights and not giving water and food to Covid patients. "They had nurses working in the ICUs that hadn't even gotten their nursing degree yet. They were still students," he said. The hospital death protocols were systematized via the regulatory frameworks of the PREP Act and Emergency Use Authorizations for the PRC Test, Remdesivir and ventilators. And they were executed through the command chain from federal health agencies to hospital conglomerates to hospital administrators and from there down to doctors and nurses. DePriest told McCarthy when he interviewed her for his book: "We started following the CARES Act money to see where it was going, and we followed it trickling down through Health and Human Services to, eventually, the NIH. We discovered that the NIH published their protocols for inpatient treatment of COVID. From there, we started documenting the medications that were listed in the NIH protocols: remdesivir, Actemra, dexamethasone, baricitinib." Doctors and nurses who didn't play along, lost their jobs. All the nurses McCarthy talked to for his book "What the Nurses Saw" were fired. But almost everyone complied with the protocols. Nurses from other states who applied to work where help was needed received salaries of $10,000 per week. They were hired by medical contractor companies who also made a killing by contracting the nurses. McCarthy learnt from AJ DePriest that the contracted nurses were paid by Homeland Security. He said: "And I guess there were big pots of money available in Homeland Security. And the way it worked was there were private contractors who would arrange for the labor. They would recruit and hire and deliver the workers. Homeland Security would pay those contractors and then the contractors would pay the nurses. So the money ultimately came from Homeland Security." How the Death Protocols Were Incentivized Deaths were incentivized through a plethora of payments and bonuses. McCarthy told me: "They created a financial incentive system that incentivized medical procedures that made no medical, scientific or logical sense that were unprecedented in the history of medicine… I think that's where the vast majority of people I say were killed." For example, hospitals received huge payments for simply admitting people as Covid cases. West Virginia topped all the states with almost half a million dollars payout per Covid case. Then there were payments for administering Remdesivir, intubating people and keeping them intubated for a long time. In fact, usually until death since almost everyone intubated died: "The federal government of the United States and the medical bureaucracy and what I call medical dictatorship decreed that A, hospitals would get paid if they put somebody in intubation and B, they'd get an additional bonus if they kept them on intubation for more than 96 hours." Remdesivir also usually ended in death. Nicole Sirotek, a Nevada based nurse who came to New York City in the spring of 2020, refused to give the drug to patients and that's why she was removed from the ICU of the hospital where she worked. McCarthy said: "She refused after a short time. She said, everybody we give this drug to dies. I'm not giving anybody else this drug anymore." Sirotek was fired - like ...
    Voir plus Voir moins
    1 h et 8 min
  • The Code That Doesn't Exist: How CDC Disappears COVID Vaccine Deaths | John Beaudoin

    The Code That Doesn't Exist: How CDC Disappears COVID Vaccine Deaths | John Beaudoin
    Jan 3 2026
    "CDC is nefarious because they set up the system and they know there are a lot more deaths than they're telling the people through data." —John Beaudoin In this interview, John Beaudoin and I dive into the CDC's mortality database that is part of its WONDER platform and find things in there that are, well, wondrous. But only in the sense that what you find makes you wonder. And way more than that: what you find are glaring signs of something horrific being covered up. WONDER, in case you're wondering, is a web based public platform where anyone can query and download U.S. public-health data. The acronym stands for 'Wide-ranging ONline Data for Epidemiologic Research.' They must have started with the oh so cute acronym and then done some serious brainstorming to find a string of words to match. According to WONDER's mortality data, not one American died of adverse effects of the Covid-19 vaccines. Not a single one. Isn't that wonderful? VAERS, The CDC's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System is also part of WONDER. But according to VAERS, around 50,000 people so far died of the Covid-19 vaccines. And VAERS has an underreporting factor estimated to be something between 30 and 100. The number of vaccine related deaths exploded in VAERS in 2021 and is way higher than for all vaccine deaths taken together since 1990 when VAERS saw the light of the day. Now, how can it possibly be that there are no Covid-19 vaccine deaths to be found in the U.S. official mortality data and at the same time there are 50,000 Covid-19 vaccine deaths reported, mostly by healthcare professionals, in VAERS? It's simple. In January of 2021, the WHO issued new ICD-10 codes to cover the new mRNA Covid vaccines. And the code U12.9 was designated to be used for vaccine adverse events caused by them. ICD‑10 stands for 'International Classification of Diseases, Revision 10.' It's maintained by the World Health Organization. The ICD system is vast: it contains ~70,000 diagnosis codes, and about the same number of procedure codes. These standardized alphanumeric codes are used worldwide to classify diseases as well as causes of death for statistical and billing purposes. But when you search the CDC's WONDER database, there is not a single death listed under U12.9. In fact, it is impossible for a U12.9 coded death to exist in the WONDER database. And the reason for that is that the WONDER database does not contain the code U12.9 that the WHO especially issued in order for countries around the world to mark deaths as Covid-19 vaccine deaths. And not only that: none of the codes that the WHO added for Covid-19 are to be found in WONDER. Not one: not code U07.1 ('COVID-10, virus identified'), not code U07.2 ('COVID-19, virus not identified'), not code U08.9 ('Personal history of COVID-19, unspecified') and not code U09.9 ('Post COVID-19 condition, unspecified'). And because U12.9 is not in WONDER, health officials across the United States could proclaim that there was not a single Covid-19 vaccine death. For example, the chief of the Bureau of Statistics of New Hampshire said publicly without batting an eye that there are no Covid vaccine related deaths in New Hampshire, zero. But then, you ask, how are Covid-19 vaccine deaths coded if not with U12.9? Because there were some brave doctors who dared to list the mRNA vaccines as cause of death on the death certificate. Such deaths are coded with U12.9's parent code which is Y59.0. Which is meant to be used for adverse events of viral vaccines. Which the mRNA vaccines are not. Death by the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines were simply thrown in with viral vaccines. And thus it's impossible to distinguish whether death was caused by a viral vaccine or an mRNA vaccine. Well then, how many deaths are in WONDER for viral vaccines? And that's another miracle: Before Covid, almost none. That's right, according to U.S. mortality data, almost nobody in the United States died from vaccine adverse events pre-Covid. To be precise: 11 deaths between 1999 and 2020 were coded with Y59.0 as Underlying Cause of Death (UCoD). Eleven. About one every other year. If you run the same query for Multiple Cause of Death (MCoD), then you get 30 deaths (in case you're not familiar with the distinction between the two, watch my previous interview with John Beaudoin 'The Data Trick Masking a Surge in Kidney Failure Deaths.' The link is below under 'Resources'). Does that number match up with what is in VAERS? Of course not. However, in 2021 something extraordinary happens in WONDER: the viral vaccine deaths increase dramatically. In 2020, the number of deaths coded with Y59.0 was so small that it was suppressed in WONDER. For privacy reasons, numbers are not shown when they are between 1 and 9. In 2020, the number of deaths coded with Y59.0 was minuscule, something between 1 and 6. But in 2021, an absolutely astonishing number of deaths is coded with Y59.0: 195. More than all the deaths coded as viral vaccine deaths taken ...
    Voir plus Voir moins
    52 min
  • The Data Trick Masking a Surge in Kidney Failure Deaths | John Beaudoin

    The Data Trick Masking a Surge in Kidney Failure Deaths | John Beaudoin
    Dec 26 2025
    "The incentives drove the acute kidney injury. My graphs show that very clearly. The acute kidney injury has been around for years. They should have known it. I've been talking about it for three and a half years." — John Beaudoin *** John Beaudoin has been alerting the CDC and other health agencies about the catastrophic increase in renal failure deaths for more than three years. But he didn't get any interest from the CDC or any other federal health agency or scientists working for any such agency. He thinks, he said to me, that "it's purposeful that they haven't picked up on it. I think they know it and they're afraid because… I can show the timing to the week that this happened and it didn't happen with COVID. It happened with a human intervention, not just when the drugs were approved, but months later when the drugs were incentivized by the federal government with big, big piles of money." Incentivized drugs like Remdesivir that is known to cause kidney failure. And incentivized devices like ventilators that were a death sentence for huge numbers of people who tested positive and were intubated unnecessarily. Both Remdesivir and ventilators were declared medical countermeasures covered under the PREP Act declaration for COVID-19 - and, shockingly, they still are to this very day. When they cause death, nobody can be held responsible, nobody can be sued. Not the doctor, not the nurse, not the manufacturer - nobody. Beaudoin is in possession of 1.6 million non-redacted death certificates from the Covid years that he received through multiple FOIA requests. He read thousands of them and that's why he knows how doctors fill them out. Large numbers of death certificates, he told me, are filled out incorrectly or are incomplete. Beaudoin also knows which ICD-10 codes (International Classification of Disease) the death certificates came back with from the CDC's central parser and whether these codes correspond to what doctors or medical examiners wrote. And he understands how CDC analysts are hiding alarming signals in death records related to COVID treatment protocols and mRNA Covid shots. Mortality data in the CDC's WONDER database can be analyzed either by what is called 'Underlying Cause of Death' (UCoD), which is row D in Part 1 on American death certificates - or by 'Multiple Causes of Death' (MCoD) which are listed in Part 2. Analyzing mortality data by looking just at the UCoD doesn't give you a truthful picture of what drives mortality, he says: "I only track MCoD. I stopped using UCoD long ago when I recognized in the death records that it's not a fair and accurate representation and it could really mess up the signals." How can he be so sure that analyzing mortality records in the US based on the underlying cause of death is obscuring what people really die from? He said: "I'm the only one that has 1.6 million non-redacted death records where I can read what the death certifier wrote… I spent three and a half years [looking at them]. I've probably seen 10,000 and, from my experience, that's how I was able to determine the value and integrity of the data of UCoD. And there's not much value in it. There's not much value in it at all, which is why I stopped using it three years ago." However, CDC analysts and many other researchers, according to Beaudoin, use the Underlying Cause of Death to analyze causes of death and by doing so miss the real story. His prime example is the development of renal failure deaths in the United States: according to UCoD, renal failure deaths increased significantly in 2020 and again in 2021 and remained very high. However, this increase pales in comparison to the picture that emerges when MCoD is used to analyze death records: kidney failure exploded in the COVID years and far exceeds the increase shown by looking at UCoD alone. 0:00:05 Underlying and Multiple Causes of Death 0:00:36 Death Certificates and Data Integrity 0:01:12 Structure of US Death Certificates 0:02:23 Walking Through a Sample Death Certificate 0:06:22 Challenges with Properly Filling Death Certificates 0:09:00 CDC Coding Software and Issues with UCoD 0:12:00 Examples of Misrepresentation and Errors in Death Records 0:14:20 Influence of Doctor Habits and Patterns on Death Data 0:17:02 Handling Missing Values When Assigning UCoD 0:18:00 Data Integrity, State Variability, and UCoD vs. MCoD 0:21:30 Meaning of Multiple Causes of Death and Coding Implications 0:24:20 Acute Kidney Injury and Chronic Kidney Disease on Death Certificates 0:28:54 Epidemiological Trends—Increase in Kidney Failure Deaths 0:32:16 Data Analysis—MCoD vs. UCoD, Broader Implications 0:33:10 Reverse Chronology and Doctor Confusion in Death Certificates 0:34:31 ICD-10 and Data Systems
    Voir plus Voir moins
    36 min
  • Using Barry Young's Leaked Data, Hervé Seligmann Shows How Covid Injections Increase Annual Mortality Rates

    Using Barry Young's Leaked Data, Hervé Seligmann Shows How Covid Injections Increase Annual Mortality Rates
    Dec 19 2025
    Subscribe now Share In the second part of my interview with biologist Hervé Seligmann we talk about his analysis of New Zealand's health data records that were leaked in late 2023 by whistleblower Barry Young. Young worked as database administrator for New Zealand's health agency. He was arrested in December, 2023, and is facing 7 years in prison. When Seligmann analysed the leaked treasure trove of over 1 million health records, he found that the mRNA Covid "injections accelerate the annual mortality rate which you can call or interpret as the rate of aging." The data showed that the injections cause aging to accelerate by 2–3 times in people over 50 and that the death exponent increased from 0.07 to 0.11 after two doses. This finding, he told me, "might mean that your physiological age is...greater or you age physiologically faster than if you were not injected. That's very possible, but it's not 100% sure." Shedding effects are also a possibility, however: "The other thing is that we are shedding. It's possible that after two, three years, the non-injected get the same as the injected people… All these options are possible." Seligmann emphasizes he does not know how long accelerated aging and accelerated mortality rates will last: "I'm not sure that this effect is long term. It could be, but we don't have data like those from Barry Young for 2024 and 2025… It might be that there is no long-term effect and that you see an increased rate of death, an acceleration of aging for two or three years after the shots but not after five years and maybe not after 10 years." We also talked about the extreme unreliability of the PCR tests. In Luxembourg, someone very unusual was done with positive PCR tests: every single one of them was retested within 24 hours in Luxembourg's national reference lab. The population was not told about these mysterious retests for years. Using Luxembourg's version of a Freedom of Information request, a friend of Seligmann did eventually receive the retest results for his positive Covid tests: "And he saw that at least one, I don't remember, one or two of his tests were negative the next day or the same day. But he had been asked to stay 10 days at home and so on. So he was very angry: If someone knew that he was negative on the same day, [then] why did he stay 10 days at home twice?" Seligmann and his friend then asked all of their friends to submit freedom of information requests to the Luxembourg authorities to get their retest results: "And in the end, we had in total about 120 people who got that second result… So, on the background of a first positive test, we got a retest test and the retest was in over 80% of the second test negative." In September of 2022, they sent this result to all newspapers in Luxembourg as well as to Luxembourg's Supreme Court and to all members of the government. There was no reaction from anyone - silence from the media, the court and politicians: "We did not get any answer, any reaction from anyone… so it's like we didn't do it. Literally like we didn't do it. No one speaks about it." Another particularity in Luxembourg was that the delay between the first and second mRNA Covid injections was longer than in other countries. Seligmann told me, this longer window between successive injections might have resulted in fewer adverse events in Luxembourg: "It's strange that we have so few very bad...adverse effects in Luxembourg, relative to other countries." Perhaps, he said, officials intentionally delayed the second shot: "And maybe by precaution or because they knew, they tried to minimize the number of adverse events in Luxembourg, because we have, of course, adverse events, but not so many… If the delay is longer, that doesn't mean you won't have any adverse effects. You will simply have fewer." CHAPTERS 0:00:05 Accelerated Aging and Death Rates Linked to Injections 0:06:07 Discussion on Short- and Long-Term Effects of Injections 0:08:35 Barry Young, Data Leaks, and Legal Consequences 0:09:34 Reiner Fuellmich; PCR Testing in Luxembourg 0:13:36 Manipulation and Official Responses to PCR Data 0:16:16 Technical Discussion: PCR Testing Accuracy and Cycle Thresholds 0:21:06 Vaccination Timing, Adverse Events, and Data Sharing in Luxembourg 0:23:51 Presentation and Impact of Excess Mortality Data 0:26:18 Patterns in Mortality Spikes and Public Health Policies 0:29:09 Vitamin D and COVID-19 Severity 0:31:08 Hospital Treatment Practices and Vitamin D Deficiency 0:33:01 Low Mortality in Early 2020, Professor Homburg's Analysis, and Suppressed Data RESOURCES: Google Scholar - Hervé Seligmann COVID Vaccination and Age-Stratified All-Cause Mortality Risk, 2025-09-17 ScholarGPS
    Voir plus Voir moins
    36 min
  • Omniwar: Transnational Elite's Total War Against Humanity | Jacob Nordangård

    Omniwar: Transnational Elite's Total War Against Humanity | Jacob Nordangård
    Dec 14 2025

    Subscribe now

    Share

    An Omnibus is a bus for everyone. You choose if you ride in it or not.

    An Omniwar is a war against everyone. You have no choice whether to be part of it or not.

    Omniwar's goal is to plug humanity into a technocratic system of control. In which ordinary humans have no say.

    It's a vertical war: Not between nations but between an uber-wealthy tech-elite and the rest of us.

    In my interview with renowned Swedish writer and researcher Jacob Nordangård we discuss the many facets of this dystopian type of creeping war we're finding ourselves in.

    Nordangård is the author of several books, among them 'Rockefeller: Controlling the Game' and 'The Global Coup d'Ètat: The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Great Reset.'

    His newest book 'The Digital World Brain' will be published in early 2026.

    Omniwar, he says, manifests across many domains: Financial control, biosecurity, Agentic AI, cognitive warfare, digital surveillance, environmental control, food systems and reproduction control.

    Nordangård outlines the historical development that led to Omniwar: "It goes back to the 1930s and the technocratic movement. I think it could be even older than that. It's a society run by scientists and engineers. No politicians, no vote. It's a perfect system for control over people. People will just be cells in a kind of an organism with information about every man and woman to be retrieved immediately."

    We discuss the tech elites and their companies that are driving Omniwar. Why are so many of them now ensconced in the Trump administration? Why are they and President Trump gung-ho on building thousands of gigantic AI data centers that nobody wants except a minuscule elite?

    What is the real purpose of the massive half a trillion AI infrastructure project called Stargate?

    We talk about the neo-reactionary philosopher Nick Land and political theorist Curtis Yarvin whom tech moguls like Peter Thiel and others have embraced as their house philosophers.

    Land and Yarvin provide the philosophical underpinning and justification for Omniwar.

    Nick Land coined the expression 'Dark Enlightenment.' What is that? And what is 'Dark MAGA'?

    Understanding Omniwar is the first step to resistance.

    PS: There's a surprise visitor joining the interview at the very end. Don't miss it.

    CHAPTERS

    0:01:35 Democracy and Technocratic Influence

    0:05:31 The Omniwar Symposium

    0:10:10 Technocracy and Transhumanism

    0:13:22 Surveillance, and Social Control

    0:18:07 Financial Surveillance and Social Credit Systems

    0:22:28 Biosecurity, Health Surveillance, and Pandemic Infrastructure

    0:23:43 AI, Algorithms, Government, and Pre-Crime

    0:27:01 Data Centers and the Role of Elites

    0:31:46 Cognitive Warfare, Information Management and Censorship

    0:36:46 Digital Surveillance, IDs, and Smart City Infrastructure

    0:41:40 Societal Destabilization: Immigration, Violence, and Social Response

    0:49:11 Environmental Control, Carbon Management, and Resource Rationing

    0:54:08 Food System Control and Dietary Mandates

    0:57:31 Reproduction, Population Engineering, and Transhumanism

    1:00:39 Weapons of Control: Bio, Social, and Technological

    1:02:09 The Ultimate Goal – Scientific Dictatorship and Global Order

    1:02:39 Resistance Strategies and Awakening Public Awareness

    1:10:29 Dark Enlightenment: Philosophical Underpinnings

    1:17:47 Technocrat Billionaires, Governance, and Global Influence

    1:22:14 Spiritual Agenda, Esoteric Influences, and Lucis Trust

    1:28:39 Ascended Masters, Secret Societies, and Hidden Agendas

    1:41:40 Final Reflections, Upcoming Works, and Closing Remarks

    1:44:00 Surprise Visitor

    RESOURCES

    Jacob Nordangård's substack
    Voir plus Voir moins
    1 h et 45 min
  • Biologist Hervé Seligmann Exposes Data Falsifications Designed to Conceal Devastating Effects of Covid-19 mRNA Shots

    Biologist Hervé Seligmann Exposes Data Falsifications Designed to Conceal Devastating Effects of Covid-19 mRNA Shots
    Dec 7 2025
    Subscribe now Share Recently, I did a series of interviews with renowned biologist Hervé Seligmann who has conducted complex statistical analyses on how the mRNA Covid injections affect all-cause mortality. The interviews with Hervé are exceptionally rich in content and cover many different and complex aspects of his research findings regarding the impact of the mRNA Covid injections. Seligmann also discusses new insights that he hasn't publicly addressed before. He is a biologist whose work centers on evolutionary and theoretical biology. Major themes of his research are genetic code evolution, mitochondrial genomes, tRNA function, overlapping genes, and origin of life research. Over the last years, he has extensively researched and written about Covid related topics. In particular, he has conducted complex and original statistical analyses showing that Covid vaccination as well as shedding from the Covid injections are associated with increased all‑cause mortality. To do his crucial insights justice and to not overwhelm listeners, I decided to divide the interviews into multiple parts. In this first part, Seligmann discusses the chronology of Covid-19 mRNA injection devastation that should have ended the shots in early 2021: "The chronology shows that the injections should have been immediately stopped because there was data, public data that I found already in January and February 2021 that clearly showed that people were dying from the vaccines and especially those people who had [had] COVID." In addition, he provides a high-level overview of his extraordinary findings that he will discuss in depth in subsequent parts of his interviews with me. Here are some of them: Health insurance data from New Zealand leaked by Barry Young in December of 2023 confirm increased mortalities for the injected at least up to two years post-injection. Female fertility decreases proportionally to female injection rates. The less time passed between the first injection and the second injection, the more likely people were to die. The injections cause accelerated aging where the rate of aging as a function of age is exponential. Which means that, for a person 50 or 60 years old, one year ages the person two or three times as much as a non-vaccinated person of the same age. Unvaccinated Children mortality is proportional to adult injection rates. Herve told me that the finding about child mortality in particular devastated him: "So this was very hard for me to believe and it took me about two months until I published it because for psychological reasons I couldn't believe the result, despite it being very clear. So I checked a lot, I waited to get two more months of data and so on, but I had seen it already in April [2021]. And the result is yes, the children who were basically uninjected at the time were dying proportionally to adult injections." CHAPTERS 0:01:23 Early Pandemic Observations 0:07:24 Start of Vaccine Safety Research 0:07:37 Early Concerns About mRNA Vaccines 0:10:50 Vaccine Effectiveness and Antibody Types 0:11:48 Flu Vaccine, Nasal Spray, and Misinformation 0:15:40 Analysis of Israeli Data 0:19:46 Adult and Child Mortality, Fertility Impact 0:24:05 Barry Young's Leader New Zealand Data 0:28:19 Accelerated Aging RESOURCES: Google Scholar - Herve Seligman COVID Vaccination and Age-Stratified All-Cause Mortality Risk, 2025-09-17 ScholarGPS
    Voir plus Voir moins
    31 min
  • How a U.N. Refugee Agency Instills Hatred in Kids and Teaches Them to Sacrifice Themselves: Karys Rhea

    How a U.N. Refugee Agency Instills Hatred in Kids and Teaches Them to Sacrifice Themselves: Karys Rhea
    Nov 30 2025
    Subscribe now The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) for Palestinian refugees publicly claims to adhere to UN values of human rights and tolerance. In my interview with Karys Rhea, we take a look at UNRWA written textbooks, classroom exercises and school materials. According to UNRWA itself, the agency "reviews all textbooks used in its schools to identify sections that may not be in line with UN values and UNESCO standards for teaching." http://www.unrwa.org/unrwa-claims-versus-facts-2025 In Gaza, UNRWA has taken on traditional government functions by not only providing education but healthcare, social services, microfinance, and infrastructure to the ~2 million population. UNRWA is one of Gaza's largest employers with ~13,000 employees. This arrangement has freed Gaza's de facto government, Hamas, from governing responsibilities and has made it possible for Hamas to focus on the maintenance and expansion of its military/terror capabilities and operations. Since almost all UNRWA employees in Gaza are Palestinian refugees themselves, they are unlikely to be neutral observers of the conflict between Israel and Palestinians. Therefore, it is not surprising to find much evidence that UNRWA and Hamas are deeply intertwined with significant numbers of UNRWA employees or their immediate family members acting as Hamas operatives. For example, Hamas uses UNRWA facilities (schools, clinics, compounds) for weapons storage, tunnel access, and military activity. Some UNRWA staff celebrate attacks on Israelis on social media. At least 12 of its employees participated in the October 7 massacres, with some of the hostages being held in UNRWA buildings and guarded by its employees. Approximately one billion dollars, about 40% of UNRWA's total annual budget of ~$2.5 billion, is spent in Gaza.​ Since more than half of the budget, around 55-60%, is spent on education, about $600 million goes to schools and education services. What do Palestinian children learn in UNRWA run schools? What we find in UNRWA's reading and comprehension exercises and textbooks directly contradicts UNRWA's claims of being aligned with humans rights and tolerance: Children are taught to "nourish the homeland with blood," and are urged to follow in the footsteps of famous male, and also female, terrorists - like, for example, Dalal Mughrabi. Martyrdom is glorified; attacks on Israeli civilians are celebrated; jihad is promoted as life's highest meaning and a 'divine right.' Jews are depicted in dehumanized ways. Children from elementary grades onward are taught that armed resistance ought to be the root of their identity and that jihad gives their lives meaning. For example, a 9th grade UNRWA-created exercise tells students that if they neglect jihad, they will be cursed by God. Students are asked to complete a sentence regarding the consequences of not caring about jihad. The correctly completed sentence reads: "The punishment of he who neglects jihad is that God curses him, blinds his eyesight, and deafens his hearing." https://www.impact-se.org/wp-content/uploads/UNRWA_Report_2023_IMPACT-se_And_UN-Watch.pdf CHAPTERS 0:03:15 Radicalization and Education in Palestinian Society 0:09:23 Hamas' Control and the Aftermath of the 2006 Elections 0:13:08 Factions and Clans in Gaza; Reformist Efforts 0:14:52 UNRWA as De Facto Government; Overview of Services 0:23:25 Education Under UNRWA: Schools, Curriculum, and Indoctrination 0:28:20 Textbook Examples: Glorification of Terrorism and Martyrdom 0:51:15 War in Gaza: Effects on Schools and Humanitarian Aid 0:56:18 UNRWA's Official Perspective on Its Curriculum 1:01:11 Ties Between UNRWA, Hamas, and the October 7 Attacks 1:07:37 Humanitarian Aid in Post-UNRWA Gaza 1:09:17 Scope of Palestinian Radicalization 1:10:18 Solutions, De-radicalization, International Proposals 1:12:21 Assessing UNRWA's Operational Complicity in the Conflict 1:17:05 Closing Reflections on Complexity and Suffering in Gaza RESOURCES United Nations Relief and Works Agency UN Watch UNRWA Education: Reform or Regression? demystifying the unrwa approach to curriculum jan 2020 UNRWA: Facts Versus Claims UNRWA Terror Ties Extend to Highest Levels of Hamas UPDATED: Evidence Of UNRWA Aid To Hamas On And After October 7th - UN Watch Gaza's Clan Architecture: The Only Alternative to Hamas's Resurgence
    Voir plus Voir moins
    1 h et 19 min
  • Behind the Facade of 'Health Security': How to Disempower and Control Citizens | Pierre Obertin

    Behind the Facade of 'Health Security': How to Disempower and Control Citizens | Pierre Obertin
    Nov 23 2025

    Please note: This is the English Voiceover version of my interview with Pierre Obertin. You can find the original version here.

    ***

    In 2020 and 2021, many people, if not most, did not realize that what was happening around the entire world was an utterly cynical powergame veiled as 'Health Security' with the goal of disempowering, surveilling and controlling citizens.

    'Stay safe!'

    This was neither the first nor the last powergame of our ever richer, reckless, vain and imperious rulers. But so far it was the most drastic and brutal one.

    The necessary regulatory and legal frameworks for a sequel remain in place unchanged. In the US as well as in Europe.

    What HAS changed is people's realization that they were betrayed, lied to, experimented on, physically harmed and killed in a breathtakingly contemptuous and cruel way.

    Their next episode of powergames won't go as smoothly.

    I asked Pierre Obertin, who lives in Luxembourg and has been writing about the Covid pandemic since 2021, how he assesses the current situation in Europe and how many people understand what really happened.

    He told me: "I think that pretty much everyone is either personally affected or knows someone in their circle of friends or family who has had a serious side effect or has even passed away. I think that by now, a lot of people have become aware of this. But they're not walking around with a sign saying: 'Now I understand.' It happens inside them, it's not visible."

    "And I think," he said, that "the crucial test will come next time. When things start again and the screws are tightened."

    CHAPTERS

    [01:56] Why were the EU crisis responses so uniform?

    [04:04] Historical development of the EU health framework since the 1990s

    [06:50] Swine flu as a precursor and EU crisis documents

    [13:13] Military and security services: State of emergency and EU coordination

    [15:09] Pandemic plans, the influence of Imperial College London

    [22:37] Lockdown until vaccine: Role of vaccine development

    [25:51] Medical care, Remdesivir, and control politics

    [32:26] Joint vaccine procurement and parliamentary powerlessness

    [37:12] Stella Kyriakides: Responsibility for Health and Food Safety

    [38:31] EMA, approval pressure, and scandal documents

    [45:58] EU Advisory Panel: Composition and Influence

    [01:00:02] Panel Meetings from March 2020 and School Closures

    [01:04:47] Role of the ECDC and Implementation of Political Decisions as 'Science'

    [01:11:32] Italy as a Lockdown Test Case

    [01:12:46] Controlling the Narrative, Fear of Public Resistance

    [01:15:23] Lockdown Decisions, Exit Strategies, and 'Lines to Take' Documents

    [01:16:25] EU Framework for Lockdowns and Influence on Individual States

    [01:33:48] Authoritarian Communication Mechanisms, 'Lines to Take'

    [01:39:52] mRNA Vaccinations: Excess Mortality and Societal Consequences

    [01:41:18] Public Sentiment and Vaccine Criticism in Europe

    [01:43:06] Outlook: Digital ID, Global Public-Private Partnerships

    RESOURCES:

    • Pierre Obertin "Geliefert wie bestellt: Lockdown & Co."

    • Pierre Obertin: Geheime E-Mails aus Stockholm

    • Cees van den Bos: Corona-Politik von der Europäischen Kommission festgelegt

    • "Profiteure der Angst" ARTE/NDR Dokumentation 2009

    • Anfrage AsktheEU.org von Sergio Pérez Sangiao

    • List of authorities represented in the Health Security Committee. Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety. European Commission.
    Voir plus Voir moins
    1 h et 46 min
adbl_web_global_use_to_activate_DT_webcro_1694_expandible_banner_T1