Is the Bible sufficient for salvation? Who has the final say on interpreting theology—the Church or the Scripture itself? In this episode, we unpack Francis Turretin’s rigorous defence of the Doctrine of Scripture from his Institutio Theologiae Elencticae.

Join us as we explore 21 foundational questions that defined the debate between Reformed theologians and the Roman Catholic Church. We discuss why written revelation was necessary for the church’s survival, the internal evidences of the Bible's divinity, and the crucial distinction between the "ministerial" authority of the church and the "magisterial" authority of God's Word.

We also cover:

• The Preservation of the Text: Why Turretin believed the original Hebrew and Greek manuscripts were preserved by God's providence and remain the authentic rule of faith.

• The Clarity of Scripture: Debunking the idea that the Bible is too obscure for the common believer to read without church permission.

• The Supreme Judge: Why the Spirit speaking in the Scriptures is the only infallible judge of controversies, rather than popes or councils.

Whether you are a student of history or seeking to deepen your understanding of why we trust the Bible, this deep dive into 17th-century systematic theology offers timeless insights.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analogy for clarity: To understand Turretin's view on the "Supreme Judge" of controversies (Question 20), imagine a courtroom. The "law" is the supreme standard that decides the case. A "judge" on the bench is merely a minister who must interpret based on that law. Turretin argues that the Bible is the Law (the Supreme Judge), while the Church is merely the minister on the bench who must submit to the Law, rather than claiming to be the Law itself.