Mass Debate: Which Direction is Best for Time Traveling? - Always to the Future vs Always to the Past
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Mass Debate: Which Direction is Best for Time Traveling? - Always to the Future vs Always to the Past
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
Buckle up, time travelers, 'cause where we're going, you don't need...chodes! But your about to get a triple dose listening to these wisenheimers. On this week's episode, the timeline gets twisted as Kirk and Kraig argue which direction is best for time travel: always to the future or always to the past. Kirk proudly claims he’s a “forward thinker” who’s too busy blasting ahead to be weighed down by Kraig’s VHS-era fantasies. But Kraig, decked out in historical inaccuracies, insists the past is where the real action is - especially if you’re trying to get rich, do a podcast with Jay-Z, or casually rewrite immigration policy. Moderator Jed tries to keep the timeline intact, but logic takes a flying DeLorean off a cliff as both debaters misuse Back to the Future II like it’s a documentary. Things reach paradox levels of stupid when Kirk promises that if he reaches the future and finds Kraig hasn’t ended homelessness, he’ll knock his dick in the dirt. Causality collapses, common sense time-loops, and no one remembers who started it…on this episode of Mass Debate!