Media vs Evidence in the JonBenét Ramsey Case (Live Discussion)

Échec de l'ajout au panier.

Veuillez réessayer plus tard

Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.

Veuillez réessayer plus tard

Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.

Veuillez réessayer plus tard

Échec du suivi du balado

Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué

Media vs Evidence in the JonBenét Ramsey Case (Live Discussion)

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails du balado

À propos de cet audio

In this live episode of Santana True Crime, we take a deep look at the JonBenét Ramsey case through a media lens: how headlines, leaks, television coverage, and repeating narratives shaped public opinion and influenced which theories people believed. I’m joined by Dr. David Hayes, who researched this exact topic in his doctoral dissertation, and Dr. Brian Santana, a college professor and true crime author. Together, we discuss how early framing can become the “official” story in the public’s mind—even when the evidence is complex, disputed, or evolving. In this episode, we cover: How early media framing took hold Why certain theories became dominant The role of leaks, repetition, and “trial by television” How public opinion can drift away from evidence What this case teaches us about true crime, bias, and narrative control ⚠️ Content Note: This episode discusses the murder of a child and sensitive subject matter. Listener discretion is advised. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Pas encore de commentaire