Send us a text

A bathroom mix-up in the ER shouldn’t become a masterclass in patient advocacy—but ours did. What starts as a comic detour with a “pee hat” turns into a sharp look at chain-of-custody, contamination risk, and the maddening silence that can stretch for hours in emergency care. We talk honestly about how to ask better questions, push for timely results, and document what matters without turning confrontational. The details might be small, but the stakes are not: a compromised sample can shape a diagnosis, and a clear voice can change a plan.

From there, we open up about cycles of narcissistic control—how constant criticism rewires your sense of normal, how long it can take to recover, and why documentation becomes a lifeline for survivors trying to reclaim their truth. We unpack real family dynamics, the way fear lingers in the body, and the slow, practical work of rebuilding safety. Along the way we share what helped us: rituals of commitment, humor that resets the nervous system, and a fierce insistence on kindness paired with boundaries.

We also confront a gut-punch of a case out of Oklahoma, where brutal assaults met bewildering leniency. It’s a window into a justice system that often prioritizes an offender’s “potential” over a survivor’s reality. We explore why that keeps so many people from reporting, how courts can retraumatize, and what meaningful accountability should look like. It’s heavy, but it’s necessary—and we keep it grounded with stories, tangible takeaways, and moments of levity.

If this resonates, share it with someone who needs backup in a hospital, courage in a courtroom, or hope in a hard season. Subscribe, leave a review to help others find the show, and tell us: what’s one boundary you’re setting this week?

Support the show