This episode walks through Mystrikism’s Mantra as a full journey: from reality, to nature, to life, to kindness, to justice, to freedom, to curiosity, to science, to truth, to awe, to mystery, and finally to purpose. Each link is treated as a real-world step, not a slogan.

We talk about:

• Why Mystrikism starts with naturalism: one reality, no hidden supernatural backstage, just matter, energy, fields, information, and cause and effect.

• How a brutally honest view of the cosmos still lets life feel astonishing, rare, and worth protecting.

• How “Life compels kindness” isn’t Hallmark-card fluff, but an evolutionary and social fact: cooperation keeps complex life alive.

• How kindness grows teeth and becomes justice, and why justice is what makes genuine freedom possible rather than just a buzzword.

• How freedom turns loose our curiosity, how curiosity becomes science, and how science is our best shot at honest truth.

• How real truths about DNA, black holes, quantum weirdness, and our “star-stuff” bodies don’t kill wonder — they supercharge it.

• How awe naturally reveals the huge unknown still ahead of us, and how that mystery gives us a sense of shared purpose: uniting knowledge and kindness to improve the world.

By the end, the mantra isn’t just a poetic chain; it’s a way of living: see reality clearly, feel awe deeply, act kindly and justly, and keep pushing the boundary of what we understand — together.

To be born today is to arrive onstage late, in a crowded theatre where the exits are already filling with smoke.

This episode, Overpopulation – A Mystrikal Perspective, is a long-form dive into what it means to bring new life into a world already in ecological and ethical crisis. We begin on Kiribati, a Pacific nation literally losing land to the sea, and use that as a lens on the bigger, uncomfortable truth: human overpopulation quietly amplifies almost every other serious problem we face.

From there, we explore Mystrikism’s expanded moral circle: sapient beings, sentient life, and ecosystems, each with their own claim on justice and care. We unpack why parenthood is no longer a morally “neutral” act, how rights like reproduction are always bounded by consequences, and why the mantra “2-or-fewer for a future” is offered as a concrete ethical guideline rather than a slogan.

Across this seven-part journey, we’ll talk about:

• The emotional tension of loving your kids while being honest about population ethics

• How small families, voluntary childlessness, adoption, and mentorship can all be forms of generational justice

• Why lifestyle tweaks (recycling, solar panels, EVs) are dwarfed by the footprint of adding a new human

• The addiction to perpetual economic growth, pronatalist policies, and “baby bonuses”

• A counter-vision of a rewilded, human-scaled world where restraint is an act of hope

This isn’t about guilt for past choices. It’s about what we do after we understand the stakes. Reproduction is framed here not just as a family matter, but as a planetary decision with cascading consequences for centuries to come.

If you’re wrestling with questions about whether or how many children to have, or you just want a brutally honest, evidence-grounded take on overpopulation that doesn’t collapse into despair, this episode is for you.

https://www.mystrikism.org

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1782830925522213/

mystrikism@pm.me

This episode tackles one of the oldest headaches in philosophy: free will. Are we genuine choosers, or are we clever meat-robots running a script written by genetics, upbringing, and physics? Mystrikism offers a “yes-and-no” answer that actually makes sense of both the science and the experience.

We explore:

• The clash between determinism, libertarian free will, and compatibilism, and where Mystrikism plants its flag.

• How emergentism and reductionism fit together: from quarks and neurons to minds, values, and decisions.

• The water/wetness metaphor as a way to see free will as real at our scale, even if it doesn’t exist as a fundamental force.

• Free will as the brain’s emergent, first-person experience of complex, reasons-responsive decision-making.

Then we push into the ethical fallout:

• What responsibility and blame look like when you fully accept that every action has deep causes.

• How this perspective can increase compassion, without dissolving accountability.

• Why determinism is not fatalism, and how understanding causes actually gives you more leverage to change your life.

• How all of this ties into Mystrikism’s core vibe: naturalism, justice, honesty, humility, and awe at a universe that has managed to produce creatures who can argue about their own freedom.

It’s a tour through the free will debate that doesn’t end in despair or hand-waving, but in a grounded, naturalistic sense of being “determined yet free” — agents whose choices matter, precisely because they’re part of the causal story of the cosmos.

This episode unpacks Mystrikism’s take on emergentism and reductionism: how “the whole” can feel greater than the sum of its parts, while still being entirely made of those parts obeying natural laws. From neurons to minds, molecules to life, individuals to societies, and particles to galaxies, we trace how complex patterns arise without invoking anything beyond nature.

We look at:

• Mystrikism’s fourfold naturalism (metaphysical, methodological, epistemological, and ethical).

• Why emergence is treated as a “we-don’t-fully-understand-this-yet” label, not a doorway to mysticism.

• How reductionism can illuminate consciousness, life, culture, and morality without draining them of meaning.

• The idea of Aweism: finding “spiritual” (in quotes) depth in the natural universe itself, from brains and ecosystems to the cosmic web.

It’s a tour through Mystrikism’s core attitude to reality: nothing supernatural required, but an open heart, open mind, and a very healthy respect for how weird and wondrous the natural world really is.

What does it really mean when someone says “trans women are women” or “trans men are men” without throwing biology under the bus? This episode dives into how Mystrikism answers that question in a way that keeps both truth and compassion switched on at the same time.

We unpack four different layers hiding inside the words “man” and “woman”:

• Biological sex (developmental pathways, gametes, bodies),

• Gender identity (how a person experiences themselves from the inside),

• Social role (how they’re seen and treated in everyday life), and

• Legal category (what the forms, laws, and institutions do with all of that).

From there, the episode explains why Mystrikism insists that sex is a real, largely stable biological fact, and why gender identity and social recognition still matter enormously for mental health, well-being, and basic dignity. It looks at where biology has to stay on the table (sport, medicine, safeguarding, some areas of law), and where it is more ethical and rational to give gender identity extra weight (name and marker changes, everyday social life, anti-discrimination, basic respect).

We also talk about deception, consent, and harm: why simply being trans or gender-nonconforming is not “lying,” why hiding crucial facts in intimate or high-risk contexts is wrong no matter who you are, and why weaponising biology to bully or exclude is a moral failure.

If you’re tired of the culture war shouting match and want a naturalistic, non-supernatural, “spiritual” framework that treats both biology and human dignity as non-negotiable, this is a slow, careful walk through what Mystrikism means by “man” and “woman” — and why that nuance matters in the real world.

https://www.mystrikism.org

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1782830925522213/

mystrikism@pm.me

In this episode, we walk straight into a feeling most philosophies try to sweep under the rug: disgust.

From a Mystrikal point of view, love and revulsion aren’t enemies – they’re siblings. Love pulls us toward kindness, honesty, and compassion. Disgust pulls us away from deliberate cruelty, malignant dishonesty, proud irrationality, and systems built on exploitation. Both are responses to reality. When you numb one, you blunt your moral intelligence.

Across this episode we unpack “principled disgust” – not rage, not prejudice, but reasoned antipathy: a clear, ethically grounded rejection of actions, institutions, and ideologies that knowingly and repeatedly cause serious harm.

We explore three key tests:

• Intentionality – the harm isn’t an accident; it’s built into the plan.

• Knowingness – they understand the damage and continue anyway.

• Consistency – it’s a pattern, not a one-off mistake.

From slave traders and clerical abuse cover-ups, to corporate opioid pushers, extremist preachers, conspiracy profiteers, and proud anti-reason influencers – we look at how principled disgust targets the architects of harm, not the confused or misled.

Then we shift from feeling to strategy. Ethical opposition is what happens when empathy and dialogue fail. It’s not about revenge. It’s about containment, resistance, and protection – saying “no further” in defence of well-being, evidence, and the conditions that make honest disagreement even possible.

Because this stuff is volatile, we spend time on safeguards:
Agility (letting our condemnation change when the facts change)
Proportionality (not turning every misstep into a monstrosity)
Evidence (never letting vibes do the work that proof should do).

Finally, we look at what happens when revulsion is buried instead of examined – how unprocessed antipathy can ferment into nationalism, scapegoating, and mass cruelty. Suppression isn’t peace; it’s a delayed explosion.

This episode is an invitation to stop pretending we’re “above” disgust, and instead to use it – carefully, consciously, and scientifically – as a shield for sapient beings, sentient life, and ecosystems, rather than as yet another weapon to hurt the already harmed.

https://www.mystrikism.org

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1782830925522213/

mystrikism@pm.me

What does it actually mean to call something “right” or “wrong” if you do not believe in cosmic commandments, divine scorekeepers, or moral laws carved into the fabric of reality? In this episode, we walk through a Mystrikal answer: an ethic rooted in well-being across three intertwined domains — sapient beings, sentient life, and nature’s ecosystems.

You will hear how Mystrikism starts with honestly declared values (like reducing unnecessary suffering and increasing flourishing) and then hands the steering wheel to evidence and disciplined reasoning. No metaphysical moral facts, no supernatural rules — just a reality-facing, “method-first” approach where psychology, public health, ecology, law, and economics become tools for moral inquiry. We explore what it means for moral conclusions to be subjectively grounded yet methodologically objective, and why Mystriks talk about justice as “naturalised”: tested, measurable, and open to revision.

Across the episode we dig into how this framework handles intention and consequence, why compassion needs boundaries, and what Mystrikism calls Principled Disgust — a reason-governed refusal to tolerate deliberate cruelty, malignant deception, reckless exploitation, and sustained injustice. You will hear concrete ways this tri-domain view can guide personal behaviour, social policy, and our treatment of other animals and ecosystems, all while keeping “awe” fully naturalised through Aweism.

If you have ever wondered how to talk about right and wrong without appealing to gods or metaphysical absolutes, yet still care deeply about justice, kindness, truth, and the only world we have, this episode is for you.

https://www.mystrikism.org

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1782830925522213/

mystrikism@pm.me

What if morality did not fall from the sky, but still was not “anything goes”?

In this episode, we dive into Meta-Ethics – A Mystrikal Perspective — a deep but down-to-earth tour of what morality actually is, how we justify “right” and “wrong,” and where Mystrikism plants its flag in the messy landscape between moral realism and “it is all just opinion.”

We unpack key ideas like moral realism, objective morality, and moral rationalism in plain language first, then pivot into the Mystrikal stance: morality is subjectively grounded yet methodologically objective. Our values and aims (like reducing suffering and promoting flourishing) are chosen by minds, but once we declare them, reality itself starts vetoing bad ideas. Evidence, consequences, and the well-being of sapient beings, sentient life, and ecosystems become the hard constraints on what can honestly count as “right.”

Along the way we tangle with big classic problems — Hume’s is–ought gap, evolutionary debunking arguments, moral disagreement and relativism — and contrast Mystrikism with emotivism, relativism, religious command theory, and “anything goes” cultural norms. We also bring it back to real life: how this framework actually guides decisions about justice, education, harmful traditions, policy, and everyday behaviour, without appealing to gods, karma, or cosmic scoreboards.

If you have ever wondered whether there can be honest, evidence-driven answers to moral questions in a fully natural universe, this episode is the start of that long, fascinating conversation.

https://www.mystrikism.org

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1782830925522213/

mystrikism@pm.me