Page de couverture de Recap: Episode 067 of The Question with Ben Callahan & Yesenia Perez-Cruz on Design Systems that Differentiate

Recap: Episode 067 of The Question with Ben Callahan & Yesenia Perez-Cruz on Design Systems that Differentiate

Recap: Episode 067 of The Question with Ben Callahan & Yesenia Perez-Cruz on Design Systems that Differentiate

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails du balado

À propos de cet audio

 Episode 067 Recap: Design Systems That Differentiate with Ben Callahan and Yesenia Perez-CruzIntroductionWelcome to The Question Episode 067 Recap. In this episode, Ben Callahan sits down with Yesenia Perez-Cruz—author of Expressive Design Systems and design system consultant, to unpack the results from this week's survey on design systems that differentiate.Ben sent the three-question survey to 1,027 design system practitioners and received 55 responses. The questions explored where sameness emerges in products, what design system teams prioritize as their primary system goal (operational efficiency vs. brand cohesion vs. product differentiation), and what aspect of their design system acts as the biggest bottleneck to product expression. The conversation that follows is a recap of the deep dive into the tension between standardization and innovation, revealing frameworks and strategies for creating design systems that both accelerate and differentiate.---Show Notes00:00 - Introduction & Survey OverviewBen welcomes Yesenia Perez-Cruz as co-host for the Episode 067 recapContext: Just finished deep dive with participants reviewing raw dataSurvey details: 1,027 practitioners contacted, 55 responses receivedThree questions explored: where sameness emerges, primary system goals, and bottlenecks to expressionFirst question results were evenly split across categories (30-50% for each option)02:27 - Defining Sameness, Differentiation, and ExpressionParticipants immediately questioned: "Don't we want sameness?Expression defined: Does the interface look like the thing users are doing? Do visual cues communicate content meaning (shipping profiles, order lists, etc.)?Sameness defined: When the shape of components overrides the content—everything looks like generic headers, lists, and footersThe key distinction: Good expression means content emerges rather than being hidden by component structureExpression is really just good visual communication and design04:42 - Did Design Systems Create Sameness?Historical context: Brett Victor's "Magic Ink" article from 2005 identified this problem before design systems existedVictor argued product designers aligned with industrial design (mechanical tools) vs. graphic design (information shaping)He cited "ancestors of design systems" as contributors to samenessConclusion: Design systems aren't the only cause, but are "the cost of economies of efficiency"The problem predates design systems but has been accelerated by them06:50 - Drift vs. Differentiation: Critical DistinctionsDrift: When things that are the same look different (unintentional inconsistency)Example: Delete actions using different icons (X vs. trash can)Users shouldn't have to relearn patterns for the same actionDifferentiation: When things that are different look appropriately differentThings should look like what they are, not all the sameSameness: The opposite of drift—when things that are different look the sameDifferentiation serves both interface clarity AND market positioning08:10 - Brand Differentiation Through Primitive ComponentsTwo meanings of differentiation: interface clarity and market positioningMyMind example: Bookmarking tool with atmospheric, circular brandingReimagined drop zone with circular shapes and soothing animationsStandard components (drop zone, color picker) styled to brand essenceMany teams start by referencing other design systems or galleriesKey insight: For core parts of your experience, create distinct patterns that feel specific to your product10:37 - Balancing Usability and ExpressionThe usability concern: Familiarity breeds instinctual understandingJacob's Law: Users prefer patterns they're familiar with from other sitesThe nuance: There's space for differentiation in domain-specific componentsWhen components are specific to your domain (not just functional), users are more willing to learn something differentThe line between standardization and innovation isn't the same for every organization12:22 - How to Decide Where to Standardize vs. InnovateFirst: Understand the role the system plays in your organizationAre you in efficiency mode or innovation mode?This can ebb and flow within the same companySecond: Understand who needs to create expression and whereExample: Polaris serves both third-party developers (who want decisions made) and internal designers (creating new products)Different audiences within the same organization may need different approachesThe person making the choice matters as much as what the choice is14:35 - Enablement, Safety, and ExperimentationDesign systems shape the culture of how designers workThe trust paradox: Sometimes teams trust the system too muchYesenia's experience: Encouraging teams to "start with a blank canvas"Goal was to encourage feedback loops of new patterns into the systemCreating psychological safety for designers to explore outside constraintsHow the system team responds to requests shapes whether people feel safe to experiment17...
Pas encore de commentaire