Épisodes

  • Shadow Politics, February 1, 2026
    Feb 2 2026
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones Guest, Zahra Aminpour, a human rights activist and supporter of the Iranian resistance movement In this episode of Shadow Politics, Iranian human rights activist Zahra Aminpour discusses the pivotal role of women in the fight for a secular democracy in Iran. The conversation explores the historical context of the 1979 revolution, the brutal tactics of the current regime, and the specific transition plans proposed by the resistance. Aminpour also draws striking parallels between the struggle for unity in Iran and the current political polarization in the United States. Detailed Summary The Historical Context and Women's Role Contrary to common Western perceptions, Iranian women have traditionally been socially, culturally, and economically active. The 1979 revolution and the subsequent rise of the current regime stripped women of their civil rights, enforcing strict dress codes and requiring male permission for travel and education. Despite these restrictions, women have resisted by outperforming men in higher education—particularly in STEM fields—and maintaining strong digital connectivity. The regime's attempt to suppress women has paradoxically emboldened them to become the leaders of the current resistance movement. The 1979 revolution itself was born out of legitimate grievances against the Shah’s brutal police force (SAVAK) and economic disparities, exacerbated by the historical trauma of the 1953 coup. However, a power vacuum allowed Khomeini to exploit the populace's frustration. Once in power, the theocratic regime executed tens of thousands of progressives and consolidated control through violence, betraying the people's hope for democracy. Life Under the Regime and the Strategy of Fear The regime maintains power through collective punishment; if a young person protests, their entire family faces imprisonment or execution. Public executions are used as a terror tactic to quell dissent. Women face specific brutality regarding hijab enforcement, as seen in the case of Mahsa Amini, and political prisons are filled with citizens ranging from doctors to teachers. Despite this oppression, Iranians maintain resilience through private acts of joy and community, refusing to let the regime strip them of their humanity. The NCRI Transition Plan The resistance rejects both the current theocracy and the former monarchy. The National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) proposes a specific roadmap: Immediate Goal: Topple the dictatorship via popular uprising. Interim Period: Establish a provisional government for 6 months. Key Milestone: Hold the first free elections to form a National Assembly. Long Term: A 2-year process to draft a new constitution and establish full governance institutions. The Path to Secular Democracy The Iranian people are not seeking reform; they are chanting "Down with the dictatorship" and demanding a secular democracy. The resistance is organized under the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), led by President-elect Maryam Rajavi. This coalition represents diverse ethnicities and religions and has garnered bipartisan support globally. Their plan involves a six-month provisional government followed by free elections to draft a new constitution, ensuring self-determination without external military intervention. Policy Recommendations and Global Action Aminpour argues strongly against negotiating with the current regime, viewing it as illegitimate and unreformable. Instead, the international community should isolate the regime politically and economically through targeted sanctions. Crucially, the West should provide technological support to ensure Iranians have internet access to share their reality with the world. The resistance emphasizes the right of the Iranian people to defend themselves and topple their own government, acknowledging that while they do not want foreign war, the internal struggle will likely involve sacrifice. Resistance Philosophy: Unity & Joy The Weapon of Joy "One of the greatest acts of resistance is joy." Maintaining humanity and connection prevents the oppressor from total psychological control. Courage in Unity Polarization is a tool of the enemy. Resistance requires overcoming division and finding solidarity in shared struggles, a lesson applicable to both Iran and the US. Key Data 45 Years: The duration of the current regime's oppression of women and society. 490 Groups: The number of different ethnicities, religions, and populations represented in the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI). 6 Months: The proposed timeline for the provisional government to hold free elections after the regime falls. 6,500 Deaths: The estimated number of activists killed in recent uprisings according to resistance sources. Conclusion The Iranian people are engaged in a high-stakes struggle for self-determination, led largely by women who refuse to be silenced. Success requires ...
    Voir plus Voir moins
    59 min
  • Shadow Politics, January 25, 2026
    Jan 26 2026
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones Guest, Monica Hopkins, Executive Director of the ACLU of the District of Columbia - ICE overreach, the threat of martial law, and reimagining democracy in a polarized America. In this episode of Shadow Politics, the hosts and Monica Hopkins discuss the precarious state of American democracy, highlighting fears regarding the potential invocation of martial law and the aggressive deployment of federal law enforcement like ICE. The conversation explores the critical need for institutional checks and balances, the unique political struggles of Washington D.C. regarding statehood and home rule, and the necessity of restoring civility to bridge the widening political divide. Detailed Summary The Threat of Executive Overreach and Martial Law The discussion begins with concerns that current civil unrest could be a precursor to the President invoking the Insurrection Act or martial law to suspend election results. Hopkins acknowledges these fears, citing the deployment of ICE in Southern California and Minnesota, and the National Guard in D.C. and Chicago, as evidence of a "pathway being developed" toward government overreach. However, she notes that pushback from figures like Representative Comer regarding ICE's presence in Minnesota suggests that a total consolidation of power might face internal political resistance. The consensus is that while the threat is real, the public's refusal to stay silent is a crucial countermeasure. Institutional Checks and the Role of the Judiciary A significant portion of the dialogue focuses on whether democratic institutions can withstand authoritarian pressure. While there is concern that Congress represents a failure to check executive power, Hopkins emphasizes that the Supreme Court is not the only judicial body; thousands of local courts across the country are ruling against administration overreach. She highlights that the concept of "due process" is becoming part of the common vernacular as citizens realize that individuals should not be treated as guilty until proven innocent. The group agrees that while relying solely on leaders to respect limits is dangerous, the combination of judicial rulings and public outcry provides a necessary defense. Immigration Enforcement and Agency Accountability The conversation turns to the specific conduct of ICE, described by the hosts as resembling a "rogue law enforcement agency." Hopkins argues that the chaos created by ICE—such as stopping off-duty local officers and demanding papers—erodes public safety trust so severely that the agency must pull back. While state governments cannot legally force federal agents out, Congress holds the power of the purse and can defund these operations. The difficulty of holding federal agents accountable is highlighted by the ACLU's ongoing, six-year lawsuit regarding the Lafayette Square protests, demonstrating the challenges posed by qualified immunity and the distinction between local and federal liability. Washington D.C.: A Testing Ground for Policy Hopkins explains that D.C. often serves as a laboratory for restrictive policies before they are applied nationally. She clarifies that the ACLU of D.C.'s fight for "statehood" encompasses both the proactive path to full representation and the defensive battle to protect existing "home rule." The discussion touches on the "Schedule F" executive order, which attempted to strip civil service protections from federal workers—a major issue for D.C.'s workforce. The ACLU is actively educating Congress members to prevent them from circumventing the D.C. Council's legislative authority. Bridging the Political Divide Drawing on her experience leading the ACLU in Idaho, Hopkins contrasts the "D.C. bubble" with the rest of the country. She suggests that Democrats often fail by "talking down" to the middle of the country and missing the shared values that exist in the center of the Venn diagram. The path forward, she argues, requires a return to civility and a genuine willingness to listen to opposing viewpoints rather than shutting people out, which only drives them toward authoritarian alternatives. Key Data & Legislative References 250th Anniversary: The U.S. is approaching the semi-quincentennial of the Declaration of Independence. Lafayette Square Lawsuit: The ACLU is nearly 6 years into litigation regarding the clearing of protesters for a photo op. D.C. Criminal Code: The current code relies on a 1901 interpretation; the reform bill was the result of a 16-year transparent process before being blocked.
    Voir plus Voir moins
    54 min
  • Shadow Politics, January 18, 2026
    Jan 19 2026
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones Guest, Markus Bachelor - Running for U.S. shadow senator of the district of Columbia In this episode: Hosts Former Senator Michael D Brown and Liberty Jones interview Markus Bachelor who is runningfor U.S. shadow senator of the district of Columbia. Bachelor discusses the necessity of D.C. statehood for self-determination and democracy, highlighting his long-term advocacy, past political experience, and urgency in addressing local government challenges, such as education and community stability issues. Join us for an interesting discussion in Grassroots Politics in Washington D.C.
    Voir plus Voir moins
    56 min
  • Shadow Politics, January 11, 2026
    Jan 12 2026
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones Guest, Dr Oye Owolewa - Washington DC's Shadow Representative In this episode: Hosts Former Senator Michael D Brown and Liberty Jones interview Dr. Oye Owolewa Washington D.C.'s Shadow Representative on various topics including, experience challenges, police subsidies, economic factors related to and for young people and homeowners, and how to revitalize communities without federal hindrance. The discussion also touches on team priorities, grassroots accountability, visual responsiveness, and change. Join us for an interesting discussion in Grassroots Politics in Washington D.C.
    Voir plus Voir moins
    52 min
  • Shadow Politics, January 4, 2026
    Jan 5 2026
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones The New Year, 2026
    Voir plus Voir moins
    51 min
  • Shadow Politics, December 21, 2025
    Dec 22 2025
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones Reviewing the Year of 2025, our Disappointments and Our Hopes for the Future
    Voir plus Voir moins
    54 min
  • Shadow Politics, December 7, 2025
    Dec 8 2025
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones Guest, Tim Hall - From Pathways to Housing DC, a Homeless Outreach Specialist for the Washington DC Area Senator Michael Brown and Liberty Jones interview guest Tim Hall from Pathways to Housing DC, on efforts to address homelessness and challenges regarding substance abuse through harm reduction and social service programs. Their discussion includes highlighting the persevering positions of homeless individuals and shared experiences, advocating a community-centric approach to housing, mental health, and healthcare awareness.
    Voir plus Voir moins
    54 min
  • Shadow Politics, November 23, 2025
    Nov 24 2025
    Shadow Politics with Senator Michael D. Brown and Co-host Liberty Jones Is the United States at War with Venezuela? What are we doing in the Caribbean? With Guest, Admiral Joe Sestak The U.S. has a significant military presence in the Caribbean, including the USS Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group, the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group, other destroyers and a submarine. This buildup is part of Operation Southern Spear, designed to enhance security, detect and disrupt drug trafficking, and maintain a strong military posture in the Western Hemisphere. Why has President Trump commanded all these military assets to the Caribbean? Is the president planning to go to war with Venezuela? ADMIRAL JOE SESTAK and I will discuss these new developments at sea. More about Admiral Joe Sestak: Former Democratic presidential candidate and three-star Admiral Joe Sestak is an experienced, independent leader who served in the US Navy for 31 years. As the highest-ranking military officer ever elected to Congress, Sestak represented Pennsylvania’s 7th congressional district. In 2006, Admiral Joe defeated a ten-term Republican incumbent to win a seat in the US House of Representatives, where he served two terms. In 2010, Rep. Sestak defeated a longtime senator in the Democratic primary. While in Congress, Sestak had a reputation of getting bills passed. In recent years, Sestak has led a nonprofit that promotes science education. Joe Sestak, PhD, is one of the high-profile people who have joined the Forward Party — an emerging third party.
    Voir plus Voir moins
    57 min