Split-Second Decisions Under Fire
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
Listen in!
Takeaways:
- Use-of-force decisions are judged without the benefit of hindsight—by law.
- Deadly threats don’t always look like guns or knives.
- Rocks can constitute lethal force depending on context and intent.
- Once a threat is perceived, the body doesn’t instantly de-escalate.
- Officers must decide in seconds what others analyze for months.
- Fitness and confidence directly affect escalation decisions.
- Out-of-shape officers are more likely to rely on lethal force.
- Tasers and less-lethal tools are not guaranteed solutions.
- Fear of public backlash changes officer behavior in dangerous ways.
- Social media incentivizes outrage, not understanding.
- Many situations escalate because force wasn’t applied early enough.
- Body cameras protect truth—but also fuel Monday-morning quarterbacking.
- Legal justification does not equal moral comfort.
- Modern policing creates hesitation that can cost lives.
- Training gaps leave officers unprepared for real-world chaos.
- Officer survival and public safety must remain the priority.
Thank you for listening to this episoce of FIT Responder!
Thank you for listening to Fit Responder. If you would like to see if it's a fit to work with us in any capacity, please visit FitResponder.com as well follow us on Instagram at @fitresponder
Pas encore de commentaire