Study Critique: What Went Wrong and How We'd Do It Differently | Season 6 Episode 5
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Study Critique: What Went Wrong and How We'd Do It Differently | Season 6 Episode 5
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
In this episode Lucy and Ellie dig into a recently publicized paper, "Vaccination and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Study of Nine-Year-Old Children Enrolled in Medicaid", which has gained attention after being promoted by RFK Jr. as evidence that vaccines cause autism.
Ellie breaks down her Substack critique of the study. Together, she and Lucy discuss the methodological flaws and what a better version of this study might look like.
- Vaccination and Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Study of Nine-Year-Old Children Enrolled in Medicaid: https://publichealthpolicyjournal.com/vaccination-and-neurodevelopmental-disorders-a-study-of-nine-year-old-children-enrolled-in-medicaid/
- RFK Jr is promoting a new study claiming "vaccines cause autism" but it doesn't add up. Literally [Ellie's substack]: https://epiellie.substack.com/p/rfk-jr-is-promoting-a-new-study-claiming
Follow along on Bluesky:
- Ellie: @epiellie.bsky.social
- Lucy: @lucystats.bsky.social
🎶 Our intro/outro music is courtesy of Joseph McDade. Edited by Cameron Bopp.
Ce que les auditeurs disent de Study Critique: What Went Wrong and How We'd Do It Differently | Season 6 Episode 5
Moyenne des évaluations de clientsÉvaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.
Il n'y a pas encore de critiques pour ce titre.