Obtenez 3 mois à 0,99 $/mois

OFFRE D'UNE DURÉE LIMITÉE
Page de couverture de Supreme Court Opinions Read

Supreme Court Opinions Read

Supreme Court Opinions Read

Auteur(s): Supreme Court Opinions Read
Écouter gratuitement

À propos de cet audio

It's exactly what it says on the tin. I read Supreme Court opinions so you don't have to. This channel is not affiliated with the Supreme Court of the United States in any way.Supreme Court Opinions Read Politique Sciences politiques
Épisodes
  • Ep. 8 - Wisconsin Bell, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Heath: Definition Of “Claim” Under The FCA
    Dec 13 2025

    In episode 8 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Wisconsin Bell Inc. v United States ex rel. Heath. At issue in this case, whether a request for reimbursement from the Universal Service Fund constitutes a "claim" under the False Claims Act.

    Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r10_mlio.pdfLinkree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

    Voir plus Voir moins
    55 min
  • Ep. 7 - Republic of Hungary v Simon: Traceability Of Commingled Money Under FSIA’s Expropriation Exception
    Dec 8 2025

    In episode 6 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Republic of Hungary v Simon. At issue in this case, whether alleging expropriated money was commingled with unrelated money in an account, which was then used for commercial acctivity in the United States is sufficient to satisfy the commercial nexus requirement in the FSIA's expropriation exception to foreign sovereign immunity.

    Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r09_1b7d.pdf

    Linkree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

    Voir plus Voir moins
    52 min
  • Ep. 6 - Andrew v White: Clearly Established Federal Law Under The AEDPA
    Dec 5 2025

    In episode 6 of the Supreme Court Opinions Read podcast, we read the Supreme Court's opinion in Andrew v White. At issue in this case, whether it is clearly established in federal law, for purposes of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act, that the Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment prohibits introduction of irrelevant evidence at trial that is so prejudicial as to render the trial fundamentally unfair.

    Link to read the opinion: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/604us1r08_db8e.pdf

    Linktree: https://linktr.ee/supremecourtopinionsread

    Voir plus Voir moins
    1 h et 10 min
Pas encore de commentaire