Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Tim Salisbury is joined by Henry Hawkesworth in a new episode of the Pump Court Civil Law Podcast to discuss applications for relief from sanctions under CPR r.3.9. Henry and Tim consider the nature and application of sanctions, before offering practical advice about when applications should be made, what those applications must (or should) contain under the rules and caselaw and also offer their tips about how to increase an application’s chances of success.

During the episode, Henry refers to the following rules and cases:

• Civil Procedure Rules r.2.11, r.3.7(a)(i), r.3.8, r.3.9, r.3.14, r.23.3, r.32.10,
• Yesss (A) Electrical Ltd v Warren [2024] EWCA Civ 14
• Denton v TH White Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 906
• Mitchell v News Group Newspapers Limited [2013] EWCA Civ 1537
• Hayden v Charlton [2011] EWCA Civ 791
• Durrant v Chief Constable of Avon and Somerset [2013] EWCA Civ 1624
• Bangs v FM Conway Ltd [2024] EWCA Civ 1461
• Boodia v Yatsyna [2021] EWCA Civ 1705

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this Episode of the Civil Law Podcast, Pump Court’s Louisa Simpson speaks with Emma Davies of Everys Solicitors about all things tactics & strategy for best outcomes, against the backdrop of professional regulation in the Healthcare sphere.

Emma is an associate at Everys, prior to which she worked for 13 years at a large nursing union representing and assisting nurses in respect of Fitness to Practise proceedings before their regulator, the NMC.

Topics covered include collaborative working with specialist legal representatives; adversarial -vs- inquisitorial approaches; cross-overs between professional regulation and employment and criminal law; and much more.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of the Civil Law Podcast, Louisa Simpson speaks with Kira Mountain, specialist Employment Solicitor at Trethowans, about neurodiversity in the workplace. A fitting topic, as 17-23 March 2025 is Neurodiversity Celebration Week. Kira and Louisa discuss some of the different conditions falling under the umbrella term ‘neurodiversity’; how and when these might meet the definition of a ‘disability’ for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010; and the relevance and importance of that in terms of having various legal rights and protections in the workplace. Finally, Kira and Louisa consider a handful of cases which look at and give insight into neurodiversity as it relates to misconduct or capability concerns, and job application processes - both in the workplace and in the Tribunal.

Cases discussed include:

• Kumulchew v Starbucks Coffee Company UK Ltd 2301217/2014
• Borg-Neal v Lloyds Banking Group 2202267/2022
• McQueen v General Optical Council [2023] EAT 36
• South Staffordshire & Shropshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust v Billingsley [2016] UKEAT/0341/15/DM
• Aecom v Mallon [2023] EAT 104
• Rackham v Judicial Appointments Commission 3303706/2020

Louisa Simpson is one of the Civil Law Podcast’s regular co-hosts, a barrister at Pump Court Chambers specialising in Employment, Discrimination and Professional Regulation, including Sport. Kira Mountain is a Solicitor specialising in Employment Law at Trethowans Solicitors, supporting both individuals and businesses at all stages of their employment disputes, as well as in acquisitions.

Please do leave any feedback you have, and don’t hesitate to get in touch with us with queries, or regarding suggestions for topics you would like us to discuss in future episodes: civpod@pumpcourtchambers.com

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Host Timothy Salisbury is joined by Antonia Ford to discuss mediation in the context of civil litigation. They also discuss the recent case of James Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416 in which the Court of Appeal confirmed that the civil courts have the power to stay proceedings and require the parties to consider undertaking a form of alternative dispute resolution. Timothy and Antonia consider how this judgment might affect various types of civil cases in the future, including those involving allegations of fundamental dishonesty and fraud.

A copy of the judgment in the case of James Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416 can be found here: https://www.judiciary.uk/judgments/james-churchill-v-merthyr-tydfil-county-borough-council/

The Pump Court Chambers New Practitioners’ webinar series referenced in this episode can be found here: https://www.pumpcourtchambers.com/tag/the-new-practitioner-series/

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

This Episode, Louisa Simpson speaks with Pump Court’s Emma Sole about all things Personal Injury in the Employment Tribunal. Topics include in what circumstances one might consider seeking damages for PI in the ET (and not the civil courts), the cross-over with Injury to Feelings awards, medical evidence, directions and case management.

Whilst this podcast is intended as a helpful guide, without too much reference to authorities, one that is particularly relevant to know about in this area is De Keyser Ltd v Wilson [2001] IRLR 324 EAT, which sets out the expected steps, between the parties, in a case where a medical expert might need to be instructed in a claim in front of the Tribunal.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.