Recording date: 19th January 2025

The uranium market's long-anticipated supply crisis has moved from theoretical projection to measurable reality, according to uranium analyst Chris Frostad. Multiple converging indicators suggest the structural shortage is actively unfolding, creating what may be a decade-long investment opportunity for patient capital positioned in quality assets.

The most compelling evidence appears in market behavior that defies typical commodity patterns. Uranium producers have doubled in value over the past six to eight months while spot prices remained relatively flat—a reversal of normal dynamics where equity prices follow commodity movements. This divergence indicates institutional investors are positioning ahead of price increases rather than waiting for spot market confirmation, recognizing uranium's unique contract-driven structure where long-term pricing operates independently from spot markets.

Beyond equity performance, utility procurement behavior confirms tightening conditions. Long-term uranium contract prices have climbed from $80 to $86 after 18 months of stagnation, demonstrating that reactor operators acknowledge supply constraints in their multi-year fuel planning. Japan's first uranium delivery in 11 years further signals depleting inventory buffers that historically absorbed supply-demand imbalances.

The fundamental problem centers on supply replacement. Global production of approximately 140 million pounds annually falls short of consumption, with no credible near-term additions expected for five to seven years minimum. Forward supply projections rely on existing mines (experiencing gradual depletion), potential restarts, and conceptual projects—none providing certainty. Development timelines extend far beyond sponsor projections due to permitting requirements, capital constraints, and regulatory processes.

Frostad's investment framework prioritizes "durability" across three tiers. Producers offer foundational exposure to scarce operating assets despite concentrated capital flows. Developers with advanced permitting, secured financing, experienced management, and realistic timelines represent the next opportunity tier, having avoided the appreciation already captured by producers. Select exploration companies utilizing partner capital, acquiring former producing assets, or operating in favorable jurisdictions provide higher-risk exposure—though investors must avoid promotional companies spending heavily on marketing rather than technical advancement.

This represents a structural play requiring years to unfold, not a short-term trade. The backward nature of uranium markets means waiting for spot price confirmation risks missing equity repricing that occurs ahead of commodity movements.

Learn more: https://cruxinvestor.com

Recording date: 12th January 2026

As nuclear energy gains renewed attention amid the global energy transition, uranium investors must grasp fundamental market dynamics that differ dramatically from other commodities. Chris Frostad, a uranium exploration veteran, recently outlined critical misconceptions that can lead investors astray in this complex sector.

Unlike oil or gas, uranium demand is remarkably stable and price-inelastic. Nuclear reactors require precisely scheduled fuel loads regardless of market prices, with utilities committed to 30-40 year operational cycles. Even at $200 per pound, reactors consume the same amount of uranium because fuel costs represent a small fraction of overall nuclear power generation expenses. Headlines about AI data centers and small modular reactors generate excitement, but these developments take years to translate into actual demand since reactor construction timelines are measured in decades.

The supply side presents even greater challenges. Uranium mines cannot simply increase output when prices rise—they operate at optimized throughput levels based on ore grades and milling capacity. Restarting idle facilities requires years of plant reoptimisation, equipment upgrades, regulatory reapproval, and rehiring specialized personnel who have moved to other careers. New discoveries face 12-14 year timelines from exploration to production, involving sequential permitting, environmental studies, and financing hurdles that cannot be accelerated.

Industry supply forecasts often mislead investors by citing theoretical capacity rather than realistic production. Actual output historically runs at 70-75% of stated capacity, creating a significantly larger supply deficit than commonly understood. Meanwhile, accessible uranium inventory is far smaller than headline figures suggest—strategic stockpiles held by China and India aren't available to Western utilities, and much material remains tied up in fuel conversion cycles.

Geopolitical fragmentation compounds these constraints, with Russian supply becoming questionable and Chinese-controlled material unavailable to Western markets. For investors, this means carefully differentiating between companies with proven resources in established jurisdictions like Saskatchewan's Athabasca Basin versus speculative plays unlikely to reach production within relevant timeframes. Success requires understanding that high prices cannot override physics or compress development timelines.

Sign up for Crux Investor: https://cruxinvestor.com

Recording date: 6th January 2026

As uranium investors navigate 2026, Chris Frostad, CEO of Purepoint Uranium, outlined a market characterized by persistent uncertainty but increasingly favorable fundamentals for a sustained price increase.

Price predictions from major financial institutions range widely from $80 to $150, reflecting what Frostad describes as "handwaving" rather than definitive analysis. This cautious approach marks a shift from the "enthusiastic overpromise" of 2019-2023, when many analysts expected dramatic price spikes that failed to materialize as the industry underestimated both accumulated inventory levels and utility patience.

The critical unknown remains global uranium inventory. While estimates suggest 300 million pounds exist, much is effectively immobile—locked in Chinese and Indian strategic reserves or tied up in the fuel cycle. Utilities maintain two-to-three-year working inventories, explaining their measured approach to contracting despite production falling below consumption.

Frostad emphasized uranium's unique supply-side constraints. Unlike other commodities, production cannot quickly respond to higher prices due to technical complexity, regulatory requirements, and multi-year development timelines. Mills optimize chemistry for specific ores and cannot simply increase throughput. Even established producers like Cameco and Kazatomprom struggle to meet production targets.

For investors, Frostad recommends focusing on company fundamentals—management quality, jurisdiction, and development stage—rather than attempting to time the uranium price spike. He cautions against overweighting small modular reactor announcements as "white noise," suggesting instead that investors monitor term contract announcements for concrete market signals.

Looking ahead, Frostad anticipates meaningful market movement within 6-18 months as utility buffers deplete. Critically, he expects a price "reset" to a new, higher plateau rather than a traditional commodity cycle, reflecting structural supply challenges that will require sustained elevated pricing to incentivize new production.

The message for 2026: focus on quality companies with sound fundamentals while maintaining patience for the anticipated price reset in late 2026 or early 2027.

Sign up for Crux Investor: https://cruxinvestor.com