Did the theologians who followed Luther and Calvin ruin the Reformation with dry logic? Historical consensus has shifted. Far from displacing the Bible, the "Reformed Scholastics" developed a sophisticated method to organize and defend biblical truth. This video breaks down the technical tools of Reformed Orthodoxy—from "Causality" to "Distinctions"—demonstrating how they were used to mine the depths of Scripture and guard against heresy.We cover:• The Historiographical Resurrection: Why the "Calvin against the Calvinists" theory has been rejected by scholars like Richard Muller and Willem van Asselt.• The Scholastic Method: Understanding this approach as a pedagogical tool characterized by definition, division, and argumentation,.• From Text to System: How systematic theology was built from the bricks of exegesis and the "common places" (loci communes) of the text,.• Metaphysics in Action: How the "Four Causes" (Efficient, Material, Formal, Final) helped explain the doctrine of Election and the book of Daniel,.• Hard Texts Solved: How distinctions like Voluntas Beneplaciti (Will of Decree) vs. Voluntas Signi (Will of Command) resolved apparent contradictions in Scripture.Timestamps: 0:00 - Introduction: The Myth of "Dead Orthodoxy" 2:15 - What is Scholasticism? Method vs. Content 5:30 - The Role of the "Consectarium" (Logical Consequence) 8:45 - Case Study 1: Causality in Amandus Polanus 12:20 - Case Study 2: Election and the Order of Causes 15:50 - Hermeneutical Distinctions: God's Will & Power, 19:10 - Christology: Did God Bleed? (Acts 20:28) 23:40 - Polemics: John Owen vs. The Socinians 27:00 - Conclusion: The Scaffolding of a CathedralKey Figures Mentioned:• John Owen: The exegetical giant who used "demonstrative argumentation" on the book of Hebrews.• Francis Turretin: The systematician who used logic to defend the literal sense of Scripture.• Gisbertus Voetius: The theologian who combined precise distinctions with vital piety to fight Cartesianism