In this episode, Jenny Beth Martin is joined by Myron Ebell of the Competitive Enterprise Institute to discuss the Trump administration’s decision to withdraw the EPA’s 2007 endangerment finding — the legal foundation that has allowed federal regulation of greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.

The endangerment finding, issued after the Supreme Court’s ruling in Massachusetts v. EPA, opened the door for sweeping climate regulations affecting vehicles, power plants, manufacturing, and energy production across the country. Now, the administration is attempting to reverse that determination — a move that could significantly reshape energy policy, vehicle standards, and federal regulatory authority.

In this episode you'll learn:

• What the EPA’s endangerment finding is and why it matters
• How greenhouse gases became regulated under the Clean Air Act
• The connection between federal fuel economy rules and rising vehicle costs
• The impact of California’s EV mandate and the Clean Air Act waiver
• What the “major questions doctrine” means for climate regulation
• Why legal challenges are already underway — and what happens next
• How this decision could affect energy prices, economic growth, and consumer choice

Myron Ebell also shares his decades-long involvement in the climate and energy debate, from opposing the Kyoto Protocol to challenging cap-and-trade proposals and the Paris Climate Agreement. He explains the legal and economic arguments behind the rollback and outlines what to expect as the case moves through the federal courts.

This is a deep dive into the legal, economic, and constitutional fight over climate regulation — and what it means for America’s energy future.

The SAVE America Act has passed the U.S. House and now heads to the Senate — and with it has come a wave of misinformation, fear-based talking points, and outright falsehoods.

In this episode, Jenny Beth addresses the five biggest myths surrounding the SAVE America Act and explains what the legislation actually does.

The bill requires:
• Documentary proof of U.S. citizenship to register to vote
• Photo ID to cast a ballot in federal elections

Opponents claim the bill is unnecessary, unconstitutional, discriminatory, or impossible to implement. In this episode, Jenny Beth breaks down those claims one by one and explains:

• Why existing federal law does not currently require documentary proof of citizenship
• Why voter ID is not a “modern-day poll tax”
• How the bill addresses name discrepancies for married women
• Why Congress has constitutional authority over federal election standards
• Why implementing citizenship verification is both practical and urgent

At its core, the question is simple: Should American elections be decided only by American citizens?

The SAVE America Act reinforces what most Americans already believe — that election integrity strengthens voter confidence and preserves our constitutional republic.

📞 Take Action:
Call your U.S. Senators and urge them to bring the SAVE America Act to the floor for debate and vote YES.

🔔 Subscribe for more episodes focused on election integrity, constitutional principles, and protecting the future of the Republic.

Listen and watch at:
jennybethshow.com

In this episode, Jenny Beth Martin sits down with Rachel Bovard, VP of Programs at the Conservative Partnership Institute, to break down the real procedural path for passing the SAVE America Act in the United States Senate.

This is the essential guide to passing the SAVE America Act in the Senate.

Rachel explains how the Senate’s existing rules — including the talking filibuster — can be used to force debate and potentially pass election integrity legislation without eliminating the legislative filibuster.

If you’ve heard claims that this strategy would “nuke” the filibuster or create procedural chaos, this conversation addresses those arguments directly and explains what the rules actually allow.

What You’ll Learn in This Episode:

• The difference between invoking cloture (60 votes) and breaking a filibuster through exhaustion
• How the privileged motion to proceed allows the SAVE America Act to bypass an initial 60-vote hurdle
• What live quorum calls are — and why they matter
• Why the talking filibuster does not eliminate the filibuster
• How Senate Republicans could force Democrats to debate voter ID and proof of citizenship
• Why discipline and strategic voting are critical to the process
• How negotiation can emerge from extended floor debate
• Why this strategy could strengthen — not weaken — the Senate

Why This Matters

The SAVE America Act focuses on ensuring that only American citizens vote in American elections and that voters show identification before casting a ballot.

Poll after poll shows overwhelming public support for these principles. The question is not whether Americans support election integrity — it’s whether the Senate will use its own rules to allow real debate.

This episode gives you the strategy, the mechanics, and the political stakes surrounding the SAVE America Act — and what grassroots activists can do to encourage action.

For more episodes, visit jennybethshow.com