
Toxicologist and expert witness for the state on contaminated evidence
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
In this episode of Cross Lab, hosts Steve Hohman and Olivia Espinosa are joined by plaintiff’s attorney Mark Choate and criminal defense/DUI attorneys Chuck Rathburn and Bruce Ringstrom.
Watch them cross-examine Olivia, who portrays a toxicologist and expert witness on behalf of the state. They’ll challenge the expert’s opinion on the validity of the BAC and blood draw procedures.
What’s covered in this episode:
- How crossing an expert witness can change your word selection
- The hidden role gender can play in your cross-examination
- An easy demonstrative to illustrate percentage points for your jury
- Using the expert to expose mishandlings in the case and create reasonable doubt
- What taking a moment to pause can do to a witness
- The trap you can fall into when you know their case well—and how to fix it
Time Stamps
00:00 What’s Cross Lab?
04:05 How an expert witness can change your approach to word selection
12:06 Mock Case Overview: State of Washington vs. Oscar Phillips
13:28 Chuck Rathburn’s Cross: Painting a clear picture of contamination
27:05 Approaching gender with an expert?
33:03 Simple demonstratives to illustrate the difference a few percentage points can make in BAC levels
35:17 Mark Choate’s Cross: Determining the level of intoxication
45:51 Leveraging the expert to expose other mishandlings in the case and create reasonable doubt
53:06 Bruce Ringstrom’s Cross: Exposing the expert’s lack of hands-on involvement
1:06:46 The impact your reset has on a witness
1:10:14 Top takeaways if you had to cross a witness like this
1:12:37 The trap of knowing too much—and how to fix it
To get free resources for your next trial go to HausImprov.com