Trump’s Shutdown Ends — Why Did Justice Jackson Let Him Withhold SNAP Benefits?
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
We analyze Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s surprising procedural move that allowed Trump to pause food-stamp payments — and why she signaled she would have ruled differently if the full Court had acted. We also examine the Supreme Court’s refusal to hear Kim Davis’s appeal, what it means for marriage equality, new reporting on whether Trump’s allies profited from presidential pardons, and the surreal “Sandwich Guy” case that raises real questions about American democracy.
The shutdown may be over, but its aftermath shows how political chaos becomes a test of the Constitution — and how fragile the rule of law remains.
Pas encore de commentaire