Page de couverture de Unlawfully Obtained Evidence v Cannabis Trafficking (SA Court of Criminal Appeal)

Unlawfully Obtained Evidence v Cannabis Trafficking (SA Court of Criminal Appeal)

Unlawfully Obtained Evidence v Cannabis Trafficking (SA Court of Criminal Appeal)

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails du balado

À propos de cet audio

 On 27 November 2014, Graham James Rockford was found guilty of three serious offences, including the cultivation and trafficking of a commercial quantity of cannabis. Within six months, his conviction was overturned, on account of police having unlawfully obtained the evidence. I look at what happened, and the principal factors that swayed the South Australian Court of Appeal to make that decision. Trial: R v Rockford [2014] SADC 199. Appeal: R v Rockford [2015] SASCFC 51.
Pas encore de commentaire