Vetting Sponsors Part 3: Key RED FLAGS to Watch for in Sponsors!
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
📌 Episode Overview
In Part 3 of the Vetting Sponsors series, Jason Williams and Frank Patalano dive deep into one of the most overlooked, but critical, areas of passive investing: fee transparency and sponsor communication. This episode breaks down common fee structures, how they’re sometimes misrepresented, and why clarity matters more than ever in today’s market.
🧠 Topics Covered
- Why transparency around fees is non-negotiable
- Acquisition fees: what’s reasonable vs. misleading
- Asset management fees and how they’re actually calculated
- The dangers of raising multiple years of fees upfront
- Disposition and refinance fees explained
- Capital calls: legitimate reasons vs. red flags
- Dilution vs. investor loans during capital shortfalls
- Common communication breakdowns between GPs and LPs
- Why “everything is in the portal” is not an answer
- Red flags when sponsors avoid direct questions
- Green flags that signal strong, trustworthy sponsor teams
- The importance of underwriting access and investor education
- Why experienced sponsors openly discuss past failures
💬 Notable Quotes
- “Fees are okay. Hiding them is not.”
- “Over-communication is always better than under-communication.”
- “There are no failures, only feedback, if you’re honest and willing to improve.”
🎧 Connect with Jason:
✅ https://IroncladUnderwriting.com
✅Linktree
🎧 Connect with Frank:
Pas encore de commentaire