Wednesday, December 3, 2025
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Veuillez réessayer plus tard
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Wednesday, December 3, 2025
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
On today’s edition of The Briefing, Dr. Mohler discusses oral arguments at SCOTUS on an Orwellian subpoena directed at a crisis pregnancy center in New Jersey, conservative birth rates, and reading and evaluating arguments closely–like the big difference between “not totally true” and “totally not true.”
Part I (00:12 – 10:38)
An Orwellian Subpoena from New Jersey Goes to SCOTUS: SCOTUS Hears Oral Argument Over Crisis Pregnancy Center in New Jersey – This is Big
- Court appears sympathetic to faith-based pregnancy centers’ argument by SCOTUS Blog (Amy Howe)
Are We Looking at a Conservative Birth Rate? New Reports Show That Future Generations Might Belong to Conservatives
- What a political birthrate divide could mean for the future by NPR
Is a Woman’s ‘Fertility Cliff’ of 35 Not Totally True or Totally Not True? – We Need to Pay Close Attention to How Language Works
- Does the ‘Fertility Cliff’ Really Hit at 35? by The New York Times (Dani Blum)
Follow Dr. Mohler:
X | Instagram | Facebook | YouTube
For more information on The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, go to sbts.edu.
For more information on Boyce College, just go to BoyceCollege.com.
To write Dr. Mohler or submit a question for The Mailbox, go here.
Pas encore de commentaire