Dimension-W: Foundations
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
Obtenez gratuitement l’abonnement Premium Plus pendant 30 jours
Acheter pour 9,77 $
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Brian Morrow
-
Auteur(s):
-
Nickolas Patrick Joseph Schoff
À propos de cet audio
What if meaning is not an illusion, but a missing dimension?
Modern science describes the world with extraordinary precision, yet it struggles to account for one of the most influential forces shaping human behavior: meaning. Beliefs, intentions, symbols, and narratives guide perception, constrain action, and stabilize shared reality—yet they resist full explanation in terms of space, time, and energy alone.
In Dimension-W: Foundations, Nickolas Patrick Joseph Schoff proposes a disciplined extension to existing scientific frameworks: Dimension W, an informational dimension inferred from the observable effects of meaning on individual and collective systems. Drawing on systems theory, dynamical models, psychology, information science, and philosophy, this book develops a rigorous, non-mystical account of how meaning functions as a real, interacting constraint on behavior and cognition.
Rather than offering speculation or ideology, this volume establishes a careful foundation. It shows why spacetime-only explanations are incomplete, how science historically justifies new dimensions through interaction effects, and how meaning can be modeled as a navigable informational manifold with attractors, trajectories, and phase transitions. Applications to psychology, education, and artificial systems are explored, along with ethical safeguards and pathways for empirical validation.
This is Book One in a planned series on Dimension W. It is intentionally conservative, standing on its own even as future volumes explore deeper mechanisms and speculative interfaces.
Dimension-W: Foundations is written for scientists, clinicians, educators, and serious listeners seeking a coherent framework for understanding meaning—not as metaphor, but as structure.