
Superior
The Return of Race Science
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
3 mois gratuits
Acheter pour 27,43 $
Aucun mode de paiement valide enregistré.
Nous sommes désolés. Nous ne pouvons vendre ce titre avec ce mode de paiement
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Hannah Melbourn
-
Auteur(s):
-
Angela Saini
À propos de cet audio
2019 Best-Of Lists: 10 Best Science Books of the Year (Smithsonian Magazine) · Best Science Books of the Year (NPR's Science Friday) · Best Science and Technology Books from 2019 (Library Journal)
An astute and timely examination of the re-emergence of scientific research into racial differences.
Superior tells the disturbing story of the persistent thread of belief in biological racial differences in the world of science.
After the horrors of the Nazi regime in World War II, the mainstream scientific world turned its back on eugenics and the study of racial difference. But a worldwide network of intellectual racists and segregationists quietly founded journals and funded research, providing the kind of shoddy studies that were ultimately cited in Richard Herrnstein and Charles Murray’s 1994 title The Bell Curve, which purported to show differences in intelligence among races.
If the vast majority of scientists and scholars disavowed these ideas and considered race a social construct, it was an idea that still managed to somehow survive in the way scientists thought about human variation and genetics. Dissecting the statements and work of contemporary scientists studying human biodiversity, most of whom claim to be just following the data, Angela Saini shows us how, again and again, even mainstream scientists cling to the idea that race is biologically real. As our understanding of complex traits like intelligence, and the effects of environmental and cultural influences on human beings, from the molecular level on up, grows, the hope of finding simple genetic differences between "races" - to explain differing rates of disease, to explain poverty or test scores, or to justify cultural assumptions - stubbornly persists.
At a time when racialized nationalisms are a resurgent threat throughout the world, Superior is a rigorous, much-needed examination of the insidious and destructive nature of race science - and a powerful reminder that, biologically, we are all far more alike than different.
©2019 Angela Saini (P)2019 Random House AudioCe que les critiques en disent
“An important and timely reminder that race is ‘a social construct’ with ‘no basis in biology.’” (Kirkus Reviews, starred review)
“A well-argued, timely, sobering wake-up call for those who believe science is always objective and apolitical. Highly recommended for academic researchers, journalists, and general science readers alike.” (Library Journal, starred review)
“In Superior, Saini expertly chronicles the broader social forces that have reinvigorated race science.... For such a weighty topic, Superior is a surprisingly easy-to-read blend of science reporting, cultural criticism, and personal reflection.” (Slate)
"In this essential book, Angela Saini deftly shows how science and racism have long been intertwined, why that pernicious history continues to this day, and why ‘race science’ is so deeply flawed. Deeply researched, masterfully written, and sorely needed, Superior is an exceptional work by one of the world’s best science writers.” (Ed Yong, author of I Contain Multitudes: The Microbes Within Us and a Grander View of Life)
Ce que les auditeurs disent de Superior
Moyenne des évaluations de clientsÉvaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.
-
Au global
-
Performance
-
Histoire
- Chelsea Patterson
- 2025-06-09
Superior!
Superior by Angela Saini
Is superior … obviously.
Saini, of course, has made an excellent argument about the stupidity of race science. Over and over we learn about bias, the shifting idea of what constitutes a “race”, and how people and scientists cherry pick, or use so-called truths to justify, to put it frankly, hate & prejudice.
By taking a deep time view, as well as a deep dive into the 19th, 20th & 21st century we see how it’s just all politics, and a need for some to feel superior. For instance Greeks in the US, whose whiteness was tied to going from poor migrants to middle class in 50 or so years.
It would be funny if not so serious the length some people go to, to justify their racist beliefs. Like suggesting ancient cultures that were advanced but died out, aliens, spontaneous evaluation from different hominids that just happen to both produce modern humans. Instead of just accepting the civilization in question are humans just as you are- capable of all that we are capable of!
We see peoples using unnamed genes or reworking race to explain things that would be more clearly and better explained with socio-economic differences, prejudice laws, systemic racism, and a history of racist policy or bias. Or how racist journals and academics not only rework data to confirm their beliefs but recite and quote each other making it seem like a large consensus when in fact it’s 10 people quoting the other people 20 times… how they use poor knowledge of science, gloss over other factors, or just general pride to gain traction.
It seems humans for so many reasons want a simple explanation or to categorize people. But why is not explained. What is explained is the institutions, co-opting of linguistics, culture, and science to ensure money, power, and populations are controlled for a select few. And it is enlightening.
This book is for anyone interested in history and wants to understand the legacy of academic racism and the continued impacts of othering.
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.
Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.
-
Au global
-
Performance
-
Histoire
- Jake L.S.
- 2019-07-18
A decent observation
The auhor did a decent job of looking at race and science through history however she did not present enough facts..she made this complex issue ironically very black and white painting all right wingers and supporters of the president as the bad guys. She would have been better off being more objective because the issue is not just political, it is scientific. She did a decent job overall showing that we all have far more similarities than differences. I dont know if the author has much of a sense of humor though..sadly.
Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.
Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.
Vous avez donné votre avis sur cette évaluation.