OFFRE D'UNE DURÉE LIMITÉE. Obtenez 3 mois à 0,99 $/mois. Profiter de l'offre.
Page de couverture de What I Believe

What I Believe

Aperçu
En profiter Essayer pour 0,00 $
L'offre prend fin le 16 décembre 2025 à 23 h 59, HP.
Exclusivité Prime: 2 titres gratuits à choisir pendant l'essa. Des conditions s’appliquent.
Vos 3 premiers mois d'Audible à seulement 0,99 $/mois
1 nouveauté ou titre populaire à choisir chaque mois – ce titre vous appartiendra.
L'écoute illimitée des milliers de livres audio, de balados et de titres originaux inclus.
L'abonnement se renouvelle automatiquement au tarif de 0,99 $/mois pendant 3 mois, et au tarif de 14,95 $/mois ensuite. Annulation possible à tout moment.
Choisissez 1 livre audio par mois dans notre incomparable catalogue.
Écoutez à volonté des milliers de livres audio, de livres originaux et de balados.
L'abonnement Premium Plus se renouvelle automatiquement au tarif de 14,95 $/mois + taxes applicables après 30 jours. Annulation possible à tout moment.

What I Believe

Auteur(s): Emma Goldman
Narrateur(s): Jean Norman
En profiter Essayer pour 0,00 $

14,95 $/mois après 3 mois. L'offre prend fin le 16 décembre 2025 à 23 h 59, HP. Annulation possible à tout moment.

14,95$ par mois après 30 jours. Annulable en tout temps.

Acheter pour 6,20 $

Acheter pour 6,20 $

À propos de cet audio

In this pamphlet, Emma Goldman outlines her beliefs on property, the church, love and marriage, and violence. She states that students of the history of progressive thought are well aware that every idea in its early stages has been misrepresented and that the adherents of such ideas have been maligned and persecuted. In conclusion, Goldman claims that only anarchism makes nonauthoritarian organization a reality, since it abolishes the existing antagonism between individuals and classes.

Public Domain (P)2018 Museum Audiobooks
Politique Sciences politiques
Tout
Les plus pertinents
Understanding of the violent nature of the state, while not acknowledging the violence inherent in the destruction of private property.

Emma would know one owns oneself, but the fails to realize that this one also owns the products of their labour.

Property is an extension of ones self.

Through a the application of our faculties against the world in its state of nature, we create something new which was created by you, using your faculties and is thus an extension of your ownership of yourself to the things you create.

The application of the violence of the state however in both the definition and the enforcement of those property rights, does not then follow to be just or correct.

If I killed a fish. And there are 2 of us. You do not have an equal claim to that fish. If you were to take that fish, a primal instinct would emerge within me to stop you. This is because our property is necessary to our survival. The act of you taking the fish, may not be physical violence against my body, but it is an attack on my ability to survive. Perhaps I consumed all my energy in the acquisition or said fish. You taking that fish, will directly result in at least pain, and possibly death. The fish is mine. Should I share the fish? Probably, both morally and logically. But where the fish goes, is my choice. To deprive me of that choice, is an act off violence.

Lovely short listen however, A rich perspective. I will probably listen to it again. Recommend.

Honesty of motivation

Un problème est survenu. Veuillez réessayer dans quelques minutes.