In 1919, eight men—some stars, some role players, all wearing the same crisp white uniform—made a decision that would rewrite the rules of American sports forever. In this episode of The Adrian Moment, Ocean Murff and Jim Pullen sit down with John Sayles’ 1988 film Eight Men Out, a dramatization of the Black Sox scandal, and find themselves caught in a dense web of baseball, economics, betrayal, and mythmaking.

But what if Shoeless Joe Jackson wasn’t the folk hero we make him out to be? What if these players weren’t victims of greedy owners and shady gamblers, but instead just a group of men who made a deeply human, deeply flawed choice? What if the real tragedy wasn’t that they were punished too harshly—but that they weren’t nearly clever enough in their deceit?

This is an episode about history, yes—but more than that, it’s about how we choose to remember. Ocean plays the skeptic, peeling away the mythos of Shoeless Joe and the halo around Buck Weaver. Jim plays the historian, a lover of the game trying to reconcile his boyhood baseball heroes with the adult realities of systemic corruption and personal failure. Along the way, they debate D.B. Sweeney’s acting choices, the legality of sports betting in 1919, and why Michael Rooker might be the perfect sleaze.

There’s a fight about Kevin Costner. A surprisingly heated discussion about catcher’s mitts. And a brilliantly meandering detour into whether White Men Can’t Jump qualifies as a sports gambling movie. This isn’t just about a film. It’s about what we talk about when we talk about baseball—and who we choose to forgive.

Because sometimes, the game isn’t just about wins and losses. Sometimes, the real story is the one we tell after the final inning.

Links & Notes

• Become a Member to get bonus episodes, deeper dives, and support the show.
• Join our Discord community to talk sports, movies, and the ones that got away.

Like, rate, review, and—most of all—share with someone who knows the difference between a real underdog and a Hollywood rewrite. See you on the court.

---
Learn more about supporting this podcast by becoming a member. It's just $5/month or $55/year. Visit our website to learn more.

If You Build It, Will They Clap?

It’s hard to overstate what Hoosiers means to a certain breed of sports movie fan. But do Ocean and Jim buy the hype? This week, Ocean, making his rookie appearance with the film, and Jim, decades removed from his last viewing, take the full-court press to Indiana’s mythic hardwood, looking for answers in small-town dust and the echo of slow claps. Is this the David and Goliath story you remember, or just a fairy tale draped in team colors and nostalgia? Turns out, for all the talk of underdogs, the real Goliath here might be the memory of watching sports movies when you were a kid.

Ocean’s never seen the film—Jim practically grew up with it—and that split leads to a conversation about how Hoosiers lands (or doesn’t) in 2024. They dig into the oddities: Gene Hackman’s “perpetually 80” aura, Dennis Hopper’s perhaps-unnecessary Oscar-nominated town drunk, the inexplicable lack of credit for military service in small-town Indiana, and, yes, the slow clap—Hoosiers or Lucas, which came first? There’s real warmth for the film’s spirit of community and second chances, but also an honest accounting for the ways time, distance, and real-life history have left some of the “true story” on the cutting room floor. Ocean and Jim ask: when you strip away the mythology, what are you really rooting for? And is that enough?

If you’ve ever wondered why sports movies are less about the game and more about who’s sitting in the stands—or if you just want to argue about who invented the slow clap—this is your episode.

Links:

• Become a Member to get bonus episodes, deeper dives, and support the show.
• Join our Discord community to talk sports, movies, and the ones that got away.

Like, rate, review, and—most of all—share with someone who knows the difference between a real underdog and a Hollywood rewrite. See you on the court.

---
Learn more about supporting this podcast by becoming a member. It's just $5/month or $55/year. Visit our website to learn more.

Boxing is dead. Long live boxing. Or, actually, long live robots punching each other into scrap metal while Hugh Jackman does his best impression of a man who should be less likable than he is. That’s the premise at the heart of Real Steel, and if it sounds absurd, you’re not wrong. But here’s the twist: Ocean and Jim spend ninety minutes proving that absurdity, when executed with enough chutzpah, heart, and spare robot parts, sometimes works out just fine.

This week, Ocean Murff (forever the Adam to Jim Pullen’s Max, or vice versa—good luck keeping it straight) pick apart Real Steel with the unflinching eye of two guys who know exactly how sports movies manipulate us—and still find themselves getting a little misty when the underdog robot takes one on the chin. Or the servo. Or whatever robots have.

They start, naturally, with UFC nostalgia and the eternal debate: is it still a sport if no one’s bleeding? From there, it’s a hop, skip, and full-body mirroring routine to the movie’s big question: why does a film about robot boxing make you care about broken people? Is it just Jackman’s “Wolverine effect”—no matter how many bad decisions he makes, you still want to root for him? Or is it something more elemental, buried in the scrapheap of every father-son sports movie ever made?

Ocean, who sees a little too much dignity in a dented robot’s gaze, wonders if Real Steel is really the story of Adam, the world’s most underappreciated sparring bot, finally getting his shot at the title. Jim, ever the pragmatist, roots for the kid to sell his dad on the radical notion that he’s worth sticking around for. Somehow, everyone ends up caring about a metal man with no lines and a child who refuses to be left at the gym.

They detour into essential but unanswerable questions: How does Bailey’s gym stay open if no one ever shows up? Why does Aunt Debra, the only functional adult, get painted as a villain? And exactly how illegal is robot-fighting-betting if Anthony Mackie’s character runs the book in broad daylight?

Somehow, none of this derails the central thesis: Real Steel shouldn’t work, and yet it lands—if not a knockout, then at least a split decision that’ll keep you watching until the final bell. You’ll care about the robots. You’ll care about the kid. You’ll even care about Hugh Jackman’s comeback arc, despite every screenwriting trick you can see coming a mile away.

Is this the next great sports movie? Ocean and Jim aren’t here to answer that. But they’ll make you believe that somewhere, in a gym that should be bankrupt, a robot named Adam is still dreaming of a title shot.

Listen. Disagree. Then admit you got a little choked up, too.

---
Learn more about supporting this podcast by becoming a member. It's just $5/month or $55/year. Visit our website to learn more.

It starts with a thump. Not a punch, not a kick—this thump is hips-on-hips, bodies in motion, skates slicing across hardwood with the confidence of a linebacker and the grace of a ballerina. This is roller derby, baby. And on this episode of The Adrian Moment, Ocean Murff and Jim Pullen don their metaphorical elbow pads and dive helmet-first into Whip It, Drew Barrymore’s underdog sports flick that zips, zags, and jabs its way into the coming-of-age canon.

This is a play-by-play from two guys who know the smell of stadium nachos and the sacred geometry of the underdog arc. Ocean recounts a real-life Rose City Rollers bout—600 strong in a Portland warehouse—and frames the chaos with a journalist’s eye and a fan’s heart. Jim’s got questions. About penalties. About player names. About why Lauren Much didn’t skate that night. And together, they break down not just the sport, but the spirit that keeps it rolling.

Of course, they tackle the film’s plot: Bliss Cavendar, the small-town Texas teen who trades pageants for pads and becomes Babe Ruthless. But they’re really after something deeper—the tension between expectation and ambition, the line between rebellion and identity, and the way a mother’s reluctant blessing can carry more weight than a gold medal.

They question whether the movie’s final bout matters as much as the heartbreak that precedes it. They wonder if roller derby’s fake-outs and body blows are a metaphor, or just a damn good time. And of course, they trade derby names—because how else do you honor a sport where every player is part athlete, part alter ego?

If you’ve ever felt torn between who you’re told to be and who you might become, if you’ve ever yelled “We’re number two!” and meant it with all your heart, this one’s for you. Strap in. This one hits like a Witch Slap and lingers like a bruised memory.

---
Learn more about supporting this podcast by becoming a member. It's just $5/month or $55/year. Visit our website to learn more.

Baseball is a game of numbers. Nine innings. Twenty-seven outs. Ninety feet between the bases. It is a sport where precision is worshipped, where history is measured in statistics, and where perfection—true perfection—is almost impossible.

But every so often, the improbable happens. A pitcher stands alone on the mound, the weight of history pressing down, and achieves something transcendent: a perfect game.

This week, Ocean Murff and Jim Pullen review For Love of the Game, the 1999 Kevin Costner film that is as much about loss as it is about baseball. It is a film where the act of throwing a baseball is about memory, regret, and the search for meaning in the final moments of a career. It is about what happens when the thing that has defined you for decades is slipping away, and you have to decide—right there, on the mound—what comes next.

What happened to baseball’s grip on the American imagination? In 1999, the sport was still a cultural monolith, capable of stopping a city in its tracks. Today, it struggles to command attention beyond its most loyal devotees. Why? What changed? And does For Love of the Game inadvertently capture the last gasp of baseball’s golden era?

In this episode, Ocean and Jim approach the film’s love story, its poetic treatment of baseball, and its place in the broader shift of America’s relationship with its so-called national pastime. Along the way, they reflect on the myth of the perfect game, the unseen forces shaping modern sports, and whether baseball—like Billy Chapel—has already played its final masterpiece.

Links & Notes

• Become a supporting Member

---
Learn more about supporting this podcast by becoming a member. It's just $5/month or $55/year. Visit our website to learn more.

What makes a legend? Is it the weight of history, the whispers of truth passed down through generations? Or is it something more ephemeral—an idea, a story, a narrative so compelling that it becomes real in the telling?

Ocean Murff and Jim Pullen set out on an odyssey of their own, peeling back the layers of myth and spectacle surrounding Hidalgo, the 2004 film that dares to ask whether a man and his horse can outrun not just their rivals, but their own pasts. At first glance, Hidalgo is a sports movie—an underdog story set against the backdrop of a 3,000-mile endurance race across the Arabian desert. But is that all it is? Or is it something stranger, something more elusive?

Frank T. Hopkins, as the film would have you believe, was a legend—part cowboy, part Lakota warrior, a man who rode his mustang into history. But reality, as Ocean and Jim discover, is far messier. What if the race never happened? What if the stories were never more than stories? What if, in the grand tradition of American myth-making, Frank Hopkins was less a historical figure and more a talented fabulist, a man who understood that the right story, told the right way, could become indistinguishable from truth?

This episode is about a film. But it’s also about the nature of belief. It’s about why we cling to legends even when the facts refuse to cooperate. It’s about what happens when a lie is so beautifully constructed that we want—desperately—to believe in it anyway.

Because Hidalgo isn’t just the name of a horse. It’s an idea. And ideas, as history has shown us time and again, can be more powerful than reality itself.

Links & Notes

• Become a supporting member Today!
• More episodes of The Adrian Moment
• The Long Rider's Guild on Frank T. Hopkins

---
Learn more about supporting this podcast by becoming a member. It's just $5/month or $55/year. Visit our website to learn more.

What if a boxing match could change the trajectory of global politics? What if a single speech, delivered in the heat of a fictional Soviet arena, could thaw decades of ideological frost? In this episode of The Adrian Moment, Ocean Murff and Jim Pullen step into the ring—not to throw punches, but to wrestle with the idea that Sylvester Stallone’s 1985 classic Rocky IV might have done more than entertain; it might have shifted the tectonic plates of geopolitics.

They take us on a journey through the myth and meaning of Rocky IV. They dive deep into the movie’s audacious assertion that a single man—armed with nothing but a relentless work ethic, an ox yoke, and a speech about change—could dissolve the iron grip of the Cold War. Along the way, they dissect Apollo Creed’s unforgettable entrance, the morality of Ivan Drago, and the unrelenting power of training montages scored to 80s rock ballads. But the real question remains: was this just a movie… or something more?

Drawing on historical context, personal anecdotes (Ocean once believed the fight was live on Christmas Day), and even a conspiracy theory that suggests Reagan’s administration might have had a hand in the film’s Cold War messaging, Ocean and Jim take you beyond the surface of this cinematic masterpiece. This isn’t just a discussion about a movie—it’s an investigation into the power of storytelling, propaganda, and the human spirit.

Can a film really end a war? Could Rocky Balboa have been a secret Cold War diplomat? And what can Rocky IV teach us about the enduring appeal of underdogs, heroes, and the triumph of the human will? Ocean and Jim are here to find out.

Put on your gloves. Step into the ring. And get ready for the bout of the century.

---
Learn more about supporting this podcast by becoming a member. It's just $5/month or $55/year. Visit our website to learn more.

Ocean and Jim delve into the chaotic gridiron of Necessary Roughness, a film ostensibly inspired by the SMU football scandal. But is it a true underdog story, a paean to the resilience of the human spirit against overwhelming odds? Or is it simply a charmingly goofy comedy, a cinematic comfort food best enjoyed with a side of suspended disbelief?

This isn't your typical sports movie dissection. Ocean and Jim explore the film's surprisingly complex layers. They ponder the curious case of Paul Blake, the 34-year-old freshman quarterback, and question his motivations for returning to the academic pressure cooker. They dissect the almost Shakespearean villainy of Dean Elias, whose disdain for the sport fuels a hilariously absurd prison scrimmage. And, of course, they celebrate the comedic genius of Sinbad, whose performance transcends mere acting and becomes a force of nature.

But beneath the surface of slapstick and one-liners, Ocean and Jim find a deeper truth. Necessary Roughness, they argue, is a "sick movie," a cinematic balm for weary minds. It's a film that doesn't demand intense scrutiny, but rather invites you to surrender to its goofy charm. It’s a testament to the enduring power of laughter, a reminder that sometimes, the best way to confront life's rough patches is with a healthy dose of absurdity.

Join Ocean and Jim as they navigate the complexities of Necessary Roughness, uncovering the hidden gems within this seemingly simple sports comedy. They explore the film's surprising relevance to the modern era of NIL deals and the evolving landscape of college athletics. They grapple with the film’s uneven character development, questioning whether its comedic ambitions overshadow its potential for deeper emotional resonance. And they celebrate the film’s enduring appeal, its ability to transport us to a simpler time when the stakes were lower and the laughs were louder.

---
Learn more about supporting this podcast by becoming a member. It's just $5/month or $55/year. Visit our website to learn more.