Lauren and Lacey kick off Serial Killer September with a look into one of the most notorious names in true crime, Ted Bundy. They revisit his cross-country crimes, his shocking prison escapes, and the troubling way his appearance and charm shaped public perception and even courtroom treatment. Along the way, they explore the legal angles: what it meant for Bundy to represent himself, how attorney–client privilege works even in extreme cases, and why fair trials matter even for the worst offenders.

The conversation also raises questions about whether Bundy could have operated as long in today’s world of DNA evidence and interstate cooperation, and why the public spectacle of his execution still lingers in cultural memory. What do you think?

#thelawmas #serialkillerseptember #lawmoms #lawpodcast #LaurenandLacey #legalpodcast #tedbundy

Lauren and Lacey kick off their brand-new Serial Killer September series by discussing how investigations into serial crimes have changed over the decades. From the days when police departments rarely shared information across state lines to today’s use of CODIS, DNA databases, and even familial DNA through ancestry websites, the tools for catching killers look dramatically different.

The conversation explores both the promise and pitfalls of DNA evidence, how it has freed the innocent, convicted the guilty, and in some cases raised concerns about privacy, contamination, and misuse. They also dig into the psychological side of serial killers, comparing public perceptions of “likable” figures like Ted Bundy to the disturbing patterns seen in cases such as Pee Wee Gaskins, John Wayne Gacy, and South Carolina’s Todd Kohlhepp.

The hosts tackle the differences between mass murderers and serial killers, the debate over whether genetics could ever play a role in sentencing, and how cases like the Golden State Killer changed the game with new science. To wrap things up on a lighter note, Lauren and Lacey share their thoughts on Cardi B’s hilarious courtroom moments and what they reveal about how celebrity clients are treated differently on the stand.

This episode sets the stage for a month-long dive into infamous serial killers.

Next up: Ted Bundy.

#thelawamaspodcast #serialkillerseptember #laurenandlacey #lawmoms #legalpodcast

In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey mix pop culture with legal insight. After a quick story about Lacey’s trip to Atlanta to see basketball star A’ja Wilson, they discuss two trending topics: the Menendez brothers’ parole hearings and Netflix’s new Biggest Loser documentary.

Lauren explains why both Eric and Lyle Menendez were denied parole, citing contraband cell phones and questions about remorse. The hosts explore how prison cell phones have fueled nationwide scams and how that plays into parole decisions, while also asking whether the brothers still pose a real threat to society.

They then shift to the Biggest Loser documentary, highlighting troubling contracts that pressured contestants to waive legal rights and exposing unsafe health practices that put entertainment above wellbeing. Lauren and Lacey question whether such contracts should be enforceable and imagine how a healthier, more responsible version of the show could work today.

Next Up: Serial Killer September and a paranormal lineup for October! It's going to be a fun fall with The Lawmas!

#legalpodcast #thebiggestloser #laurenandlacey #menendezbrothers #thelawmaspodcast

In this episode of The Lawmas Podcast, Lauren and Lacey continue their Infamous Women series with one of the most notorious names in true crime: Aileen Wuornos.

They discuss Wuornos’ troubled childhood, her history of violence, and the series of murders that led to her place on death row. Along the way, they explore key legal questions around wills, inheritance, and the complexities of the death penalty. Was Wuornos’ first killing really self-defense? Should the jury have heard about the victim’s violent past? And how does her case compare to others, like Susan Smith?

Lauren and Lacey also discuss the rarity of women on death row, how different states handle capital punishment, and why context matters when weighing “heinousness” against public safety.

If you’re fascinated by the intersection of law and true crime, this episode will keep you thinking long after it ends.

Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more episodes every Friday!

#TrueCrime #AileenWuornos #DeathPenalty #LawPodcast #LegalAnalysis #TheLawmasPodcast

In this week’s episode, Lauren and Lacey continue their “Infamous Women” series with a case that shocked the 90s, the story of Mary Kay Letourneau. They revisit the headlines, the court case, and the deeply troubling facts of a 30-something teacher who began a sexual relationship with her 12-year-old student, ultimately having two children with him.

Lauren and Lacey break down the legal implications, sentencing, and how the justice system treated her compared to how it might have treated a man in the same position. They also dig into how cultural attitudes, then and now, shape public perception of these cases, and why the age and power dynamics make consent impossible.

From the courtroom to the lasting impact on the victim’s life, this conversation examines not only the legal side, but also the human cost. The hosts also weigh in on other recent teacher-related headlines, privacy issues, and double standards in punishment.

It’s a candid, eye-opening discussion on justice, gender, and the law, and why some cases still make us question how far we’ve really come.

Can you really fraud your way onto Dancing with the Stars?

In this week’s episode, Lauren and Lacey discuss Anna Delvey’s white collar crimes, her surprising light sentence, and why she’s still living (and profiting) in the U.S. despite not being a citizen. They also compare The Hunting Wives to real courtroom dynamics, because let’s be honest, we’ve all watched it in secret.

Listen now and tell us: Should someone get rich from committing a crime?

#TheLawmasPodcast #AnnaDelvey #WhiteCollarCrime #TrueCrimeTalk #LegalBreakdown #FraudCases #ImmigrationLaw #LawyerLife #TheHuntingWives

This week, Lauren and Lacey break down the twists and turns of the Karen Read case, from the hung jury to the eventual not-guilty verdict and everything in between. They get into the legal side of things: what a hung jury really means, how third-party guilt works, and whether Read might have a case to get her legal fees or property back.

Before that, they kick things off with a quick mention take on the Amy Bradley Netflix doc and the mystery of her disappearance from a cruise ship.

From questionable police conduct to financial fallout for defendants, this episode offers a sharp but approachable look at the real-life impacts of criminal defense cases.

If you want them to dive deeper into the Amy Bradley case or suggest another infamous woman to feature, send the Lawmas an email at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com or DM them on Instagram

#thelawmaspodcast #karenreadpodcast #amybradley #lawmoms #hungjuries #karenreadpodcast

This week, Lauren and Lacey explore why some murder cases result in death penalty charges while others end in plea deals, sparked by the controversial Brian Kohlberger plea agreement and a divisive Indiana case where victim families disagreed with prosecutors' decisions.

The hosts address a key misconception about victim trauma in the legal system. When cases involve child victims, prosecutors often accept plea deals to avoid forcing traumatized children to testify in open court and face cross-examination by defense attorneys. Parents frequently choose plea agreements over subjecting their children to additional trauma, even when it results in sentences that seem inadequate to the public.

The practical realities of death penalty cases explain why prosecutors negotiate plea deals. Capital cases require two separate trials, extensive jury selection, and automatic appeals lasting 20 to 40 years. South Carolina has 32 inmates on death row, with executions rarely occurring. The state faces shortages of death penalty certified attorneys, requiring expensive private counsel.

While the Victims' Bill of Rights requires prosecutors to notify families about proceedings, ultimate charging decisions belong to the state to ensure objective justice rather than emotionally-driven outcomes. They criticize how the Kohlberger case was handled, arguing families deserved earlier notification about removing the death penalty from consideration.

The episode touches on systemic court challenges including judge shortages and the emotional toll on legal professionals handling capital cases. They conclude by discussing attorney Dick Harpootlian's involvement in a recent local murder case, highlighting how lawyers often switch between prosecution and defense roles throughout their careers.

The hosts emphasize that understanding these behind-the-scenes factors is crucial for forming informed opinions about seemingly lenient sentences, as prosecutors must balance evidence strength, victim trauma, resources, and the reality that death sentences often result in the same outcome as life imprisonment.

Contact The Lawmas at thelawmaspodcast@gmail.com

#deathpenalty #thelawmaspodcast #legalmoms #lawmoms #BrianKohlberger