When everyone in the room is the same, your body feels it before your mind explains it. In this episode of Just Be, therapist Sophia Spencer unpacks what happens inside the social brain when you’re the “only one” in a space, the only woman, the only person of colour, the only person with an accent, the only one who doesn’t fit the mould.

You’ll learn how your amygdala and social rank systems scan for safety, how past experiences of exclusion shape sensitivity, and how to tell the difference between old pain and real bias or discrimination in the present.

Sophia explores why belonging can feel unsafe when sameness dominates, how micro-aggressions and subtle hierarchies activate the body’s alarm, and what it means to build spaces where you don’t have to shrink to fit in.

Referenced Concepts:

• Social Rank Theory (Gilbert, 2000)
• The Social Brain & Amygdala Activation (Lieberman, 2013)
• Social Pain and Exclusion Studies (Eisenberger & Lieberman, 2004)
• Implicit Bias & Microaggressions (Sue et al., 2007)

Why does rejection feel so painful, sometimes even years later?

In this episode of Just Be, therapist Sophia Spencer unpacks the science of social trauma and the emotions that come with it: shame, humiliation, guilt, and embarrassment.

You’ll learn about:

• Social Trauma — how exclusion and humiliation can overwhelm your nervous system.
• Social Emotions — why shame and humiliation exist to protect belonging, not punish you.
• Neuroscience of Rejection — how the brain processes social pain like physical pain.
• Reliving & Healing — why old wounds reactivate.

Because the pain of rejection isn’t weakness, it’s your brain’s proof that you were wired to belong.

🧠 Referenced Concepts

• Social Pain Research: Eisenberger, N. I., & Lieberman, M. D. (2004). Why rejection hurts: A common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(7), 294–300.
• Social Emotions: Tangney, J. P., Stuewig, J., & Mashek, D. J. (2007). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 345–372.
• Shame & Humiliation: Gilbert, P. (1998). What is shame? Some core issues and controversies. In Shame: Interpersonal Behavior, Psychopathology, and Culture. Oxford University Press.
• Social Trauma & Right Brain Development: Schore, A. N. (2001). The effects of early relational trauma on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1–2), 201–269.
• CBT & EMDR in Social Trauma: Lee, C. W., & Cuijpers, P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the contribution of eye movements in processing emotional memories. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44(2), 231–239.

Why do certain relationships, or moments of connection, feel both comforting and terrifying?

In this episode of Just Be, therapist Sophia Spencer explores how your earliest caregiving experiences shaped your nervous system’s sense of safety, and why those early lessons still echo in adulthood.

You’ll learn about:

• Attachment Theory — how early relationships taught your amygdala what safety feels like.
• Trauma — what it really means (and why it isn’t limited to PTSD or “big” events).
• Emotional Safety — why warmth and connection matter more than material security.
• Intergenerational Trauma & Epigenetics — how stress and emotional patterns are passed down across generations.
• Relearning Safety — how therapy helps your body and brain update what love and belonging feel like.

Because before confidence or visibility comes safety — and that safety begins where it all began: in connection.

Referenced Concepts

• Attachment Theory: Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss. Basic Books.
• The Strange Situation: Ainsworth, M. D. S. et al. (1978). Patterns of Attachment. Erlbaum.
• Trauma: van der Kolk, B. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score. Penguin.
• Emotional Bonding: Harlow, H. F. (1958). The Nature of Love. American Psychologist, 13(12), 673–685.
• Epigenetic Transmission: Yehuda, R. & Bierer, L. M. (2009). The relevance of epigenetics to PTSD: Implications for the DSM-V. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 22(5), 427–434.
• Amygdala and Fear Learning: LeDoux, J. (1996). The Emotional Brain. Simon & Schuster.

Why does being left out of a group chat or team meeting sting so deeply? In this episode of Just Be, therapist Sophia Spencer explores how the social brain decides who feels like “us”, and who feels like “them.”

You’ll learn about:

• In-Group / Out-Group Dynamics — how our brains form tribes through similarity and safety.
• Social Identity Theory — why our self-esteem is tied to group membership.
• Social Sensitivity — how past experiences of exclusion or discrimination heighten our “belonging radar.”
• Inner Belonging — how therapy helps you feel safe being yourself, even when you don’t fit the mould.

Sophia explains why belonging isn’t about sameness - it’s about staying connected without losing yourself.

Referenced Concepts

• In-Group / Out-Group Dynamics: Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Identity and Intergroup Relations. Cambridge University Press.
• Social Identity Theory: Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.
• Belongingness Hypothesis: Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachments as a Fundamental Human Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
• Social Rank and Safety: Gilbert, P. (2000). The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: The role of the evaluation of social rank. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 7(3), 174–189.

Why do some rooms make you feel smaller, even when you know you belong there? In this episode of Just Be, therapist Sophia Spencer unpacks the psychology of inferiority — that quiet, often painful sense of being less than others — and explores how it develops, why it’s not always a problem, and when it becomes one.

Drawing on Alfred Adler’s original concept of inferiority and linking it with modern neuroscience, Sophia explains how these feelings can arise from both internal wiring and external conditioning. From childhood experiences and family messages to broader social systems like sexism, racism, and classism — inferiority can be both learned and imposed.

You’ll learn:

• Why mild inferiority can motivate growth (Adler, 1933)
• How the amygdala and social rank system interpret hierarchy as threat
• What “legacy burdens” are — and how generational beliefs shape your self-view
• How imposed hierarchies (e.g. racism, sexism) reinforce internalised inferiority
• The role of safety behaviours in overcompensating or performing confidence
• Why the opposite of inferiority isn’t superiority — it’s belonging

Sophia ties together everything explored so far — from the Belongingness Hypothesis to Theory of Mind — revealing how feeling “less than” is not a flaw, but a reflection of how deeply human we are. Healing comes from context, compassion, and reconnecting with your innate right to belong — exactly as you are.

🧠 Referenced Concepts

• Inferiority Complex & Social Interest: Adler, A. (1927). Understanding Human Nature. Greenberg.
• Individual Psychology: Adler, A. (1933). The Practice and Theory of Individual Psychology. Routledge.
• Social Rank Theory: Gilbert, P. (2000). The relationship of shame, social anxiety and depression: The role of the evaluation of social rank. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 7(3), 174–189.
• Amygdala and Anxiety: Etkin, A., & Wager, T. D. (2007). Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: A meta-analysis of emotional processing. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(10), 1476–1488.
• Belongingness Hypothesis: Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.
• Legacy Burdens (IFS): Schwartz, R. (2021). No Bad Parts: Healing Trauma and Restoring Wholeness with the Internal Family Systems Model. Sounds True.
• Sociocultural Power & Health Inequality: Williams, D. R., & Mohammed, S. A. (2009). Discrimination and racial disparities in health: Evidence and needed research. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 32(1), 20–47.