Page de couverture de Citizen One Episode 8: The Reasonable City

Citizen One Episode 8: The Reasonable City

Citizen One Episode 8: The Reasonable City

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails du balado

À propos de cet audio

 A Citizen One Journal Before diving into this next Citizen One episode—a short-form, audio-only reflection I’m calling a Citizen One Journal—I wanted to share a thoughtful signal boost we received this week, and one I didn’t expect. You can read or listen to the essay, The Reasonable City: What Happens When a City Knows More Than Her Citizens?, just below.Fernando Fernández-Monge, senior associate at the Bloomberg-Harvard City Leadership Initiative, just published a deep and generous reflection on LinkedIn and Substack about the Citizen One podcast episode where I featured the design science work of Ramon Gras and the Aretian team. His essay—titled “The Performance of the Form”—cites recent episodes of the show, including our conversation on fractality, nested agglomeration, and measurable urban performance.Fernando’s piece doesn’t just validate their work. It also acknowledges Citizen One as a new platform that helps surface and share voices like Ramon’s—and elevate the Aretian team’s research into the broader future-of-cities conversation. As the host of Citizen One, an urbanNext original podcast series, I am profoundly grateful to show up as an accidental urbanist, translator, and scribe.In each of these conversations, I haven’t been leading the narrative—just listening for the signal, and helping others articulate and share the work they’ve long been doing.I am also energized by how Fernando has situated the Citizen One series within the broader conversation around data-informed urban design, and challenges all of us to grapple with the tensions between performance, policy, and political reality.What stood out most to me is that he asked hard questions about endogeneity, actionability, and the lived “stickiness” of cities. And he still found room to amplify the value of the ideas—particularly in thinking through how cities can reason with us, not just react to us.This kind of engagement is exactly why Citizen One exists: to surface conversations that don’t usually make it past the white paper or the design render.This week I am also sharing a new solo monologue episode—it’s a live reading of a recent essay of mine, “The Reasonable City: What Happens When the City Knows More Than the Citizen?”That essay, like Fernando’s review, circles the same question:What does it mean to build cities that are not only smart, but wise?Thanks to all of you who have supported the podcast and this broader work around civic design, narrative intelligence, and digital civitas. And to Fernando: thank you for showing what it looks like to think publicly—and generously.Let’s keep building. And now, here’s my new essay.The Reasonable City: What Happens When a City Knows More Than Her Citizens?By Douglas Stuart McDanielSomewhere along the way, we decided we weren’t up to the task.Not of building cities—our cranes never sleep—but of reasoning with them. Of holding space for contradiction, consequence, complexity. So we did what we always do when something feels too broken or too big: we outsourced it. First to planners, then to platforms, now to artificial intelligence.The smart city was just the opening move. A city of sensors. Metrics. Surveillance. Optimized to the edge of the uncanny. A dashboard utopia where everything is measured and nothing is questioned. As Anthony Townsend put it in Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia,¹ this brand of urbanism is less about citizen agency than it is about centralized control wrapped in big tech’s friendly UX.Smart cities react.But cognitive cities? They’re supposed to respond.First, a little context. The term cognitive city emerged in the early 2010s at the intersection of urban informatics, living lab research, and adaptive systems theory—shaped by scholars such as Andrea Caragliu and Chiara Del Bo in Milan,² Herman Schaffers, formerly of the European Network of Living Labs,³ and later amplified by industry voices like Dirk Helbing at ETH Zurich,⁴ as well as early work at IBM’s Cognitive Solutions Group⁵ and Siemens Global Smart Cities,⁶ as an evolution beyond the smart city, envisioning urban systems that learn, reason, and respond in real time.Cognitive cities don’t just track—they interpret. They don’t just automate—they anticipate. They imply systems that can think, learn, and adapt. But if a city starts to reason, we have to start asking the question: on whose behalf? And more uncomfortably: whose values is it reasoning with?Because let’s be honest—if we’re building systems to be more rational than us, it’s kind of a confession.We don’t actually trust ourselves to be reasonable. Not in the public sense. Not in the civic sense. And not when it counts.What is reason, in the context of urban life, if not the ability to act beyond self-interest? To design for people we don’t know and will never meet? And to resist the urge to optimize for the ...

Ce que les auditeurs disent de Citizen One Episode 8: The Reasonable City

Moyenne des évaluations de clients

Évaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.

Évaluations sur Audible.ca

Évaluations sur Amazon.ca
Il n'y a pas encore de critiques pour ce titre.