
A Conversation for the Future - Part 2
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
In Part 2 of Conversations for the Future, we move from ideas to delivery. Using real workshop scenarios, we unpack how to deliver products that meet (and exceed) expectations, close the loop with data analysis, and stretch your voice through digital creation. You’ll hear a practical cadence—pre-surveys → tailored delivery → exit feedback → next steps—that respects participant input while protecting scope and quality.
We also spotlight a lean, AI-assisted toolstack (NotebookLM, ChatGPT, Gamma, Gemini, Napkin AI) to speed drafting, design, image generation, and accessibility (alt text + captions)—especially when showcasing Latinas, Afro-Latinas, and Black women and girls where stock imagery falls short.
Show notes
- What you’ll learn
- A repeatable delivery workflow: confirm scope, tailor with pre-survey insights, deliver, collect exit feedback, ship “next steps.”
- Turning feedback into upgrades without scope creep (micro-customization vs. re-architecture).
- A simple analysis loop for surveys and sessions: visualize quant, theme qualitative, note in-session signals (questions, quiet pauses).
- Creation practices that keep momentum: fast drafts → visual polish → accessible assets → bilingual options.
- Host’s real example
- Tool stack (lightweight, practical)
- Entrepreneurial playbook (patterns)
- Mini-templates you can steal
- Delivery QA: Scope match? | Pre-survey themes addressed? | Accessibility (alt text, contrast, captions)? | Bilingual where relevant? | “Next steps” sent within 24 hrs?
- Fast analyze: 3 charts you’ll always check + 3 themes you’ll always tag + 1 decision you’ll make this week.
Reflective questions for listeners
- Before your next delivery, what must-have outcomes (3 max) will you promise—and how will you verify them?
- Which pre-survey questions would most improve your tailoring without exploding scope?
- What is one participant-visible tweak you can make (in handouts, checklists, or templates) that signals you truly heard their context?
- When you receive ambiguous feedback (e.g., “needs discipline-specific examples”), how will you clarify need vs. readiness and respond without rebuilding the workshop?
- Which metric will you prioritize this month—conversion, satisfaction, or implementation—and what action will you take if it underperforms?
- Which AI tool will you add to accelerate a single step (drafting, visuals, alt text, analysis)—and what will you retire?
- What is your 24-hour post-delivery ritual (assets, checklist, office-hours invite, testimonial ask), and where does it live in your process?