That contradiction was loud. While Erica Kirk stood at the pulpit pleading, “Do not hate. Do not retaliate. Let love be louder,” Trump’s statement outside the funeral—calling Kirk a “patriot murdered by leftist thugs” and blaming “Biden’s America”—was a hijack in real time. Not just of the moment, but of the moral center.

Erica called for healing. Trump called for vengeance. She asked for silence. He brought a megaphone. She honored her son’s life. He weaponized his death.

It wasn’t just selfish—it was a rupture. A direct contradiction to the family’s plea for peace. If this needs dramatization for ensemble delivery, the scene builds itself: Erica’s voice layered with Trump’s soundbite, the crowd torn between grief and propaganda, and the missing bridge—accountability.

Comments: blackfreedomofspeech@gmail.com

Copy and paste the link to this episode on Tik Tok, Facebook and any other social media platforms is cool bean with me.

Dedicated to the Widow of Charlie Kirk

"Whose grace and Gospel truth stood firm against ego, disruption, and the public embrace of hate—even in the face of political spectacle." The Educator

Comments: blackfreedomofspeech@gmail.com

She once guided women toward abortion through Planned Parenthood referrals, believing she was offering help. But now, she stands on the other side—pro-life, repentant, and vocal about the moral reckoning that changed her. After the interview, she’s not just a woman with a past; she’s a witness. A living contradiction turned conviction. Defined not by shame, but by the courage to confront it—and the clarity to speak truth where silence once lived.

Every Bible word of God individual should copy and paste the link to this episode on Tik Tok, Facebook and any other social media platform is cool bean with me.

"When political leaders invoke the name of God Almighty without scriptural truth, they cross a sacred line—weaponizing holiness for power, desecrating divine authority, and inviting judgment that no law enforcement, no military, no human intervention can stop. As in Genesis and 2 Timothy, God is at a limit, and His people must respond with holy defiance: “Show me the Bible.” Lucky-The Educator

Comments: blackfreedomofspeech@gmail.com

I overheard the Pam Bondi, Sen, Tim Scoot and Jimmy Kimmel talking in line at the airport. I was fortunate enough to be at the same airport, in the next line. Let me explain what I heard.

Using a little fin for a serious message folks. LOL

Comments: blackfreedomofspeech@gmail.com

Copy the link and paste on Tik Tok and any other social media platform is cool beans with me.

Holy Tampons in the Men’s Bathroom, Batman!

This satirical piece critiques how extreme workplace inclusivity efforts—particularly those centered around GLOBQT+ identity—can unintentionally marginalize straight Americans. Through exaggerated humor and superhero parody, it highlights:

• Performative Inclusivity: Policies that prioritize symbolic gestures (e.g. pronoun rituals, drag brunches) over genuine respect and fairness.
• Unequal Expression: GLOBQT+ identities are often celebrated, while straight employees feel silenced or penalized for expressing their own values or humor.
• Emotional Double Standards: Straight individuals are expected to suppress discomfort or dissent, while others are encouraged to center their emotional experiences.
• Identity Hierarchies: Overemphasis on identity categories fosters competition and resentment, rather than unity.
• Call for True Equity: The piece advocates for a workplace culture where all voices—regardless of identity—are respected equally, and inclusion doesn’t come at the cost of fairness.

Comments: blackfreedomofspeech@gmail.com

Tucker Carlson has issued a sharp warning about how President Trump’s administration is responding to the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. Carlson argues that Kirk’s death is being politicized to justify dangerous restrictions on free speech—specifically through the push for federal “hate speech” enforcement.

On his show, Carlson emphasized that Kirk was a staunch defender of the First Amendment and would have vehemently opposed Attorney General Pam Bondi’s statement that the DOJ would “absolutely target” individuals for hate speech. Carlson called this rhetoric unconstitutional and deeply un-American, stating, “There is no sentence Charlie Kirk would have objected to more than that”.

He warned that if Kirk’s death is used to usher in hate speech laws, it would mark “the most justified moment for civil disobedience ever.” Carlson added, “If they can tell you what to say, they’re telling you what to think… because they don’t consider you human”.

The fallout has already begun: late-night host Jimmy Kimmel was suspended after criticizing Trump’s response to Kirk’s death, and Vice President J.D. Vance encouraged supporters to report anyone mocking Kirk’s assassination—even urging them to contact their employers.

Carlson’s message is clear: weaponizing grief to suppress dissent is not tribute—it’s tyranny. He calls on Americans to resist any attempt to criminalize speech in Kirk’s name.

📖 Matthew 23:29–31 (Jesus speaking)

“Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! You build the tombs of the prophets and decorate the monuments of the righteous, and you say, ‘If we had lived in the days of our ancestors, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ So, you testify against yourselves that you are the descendants of those who murdered the prophets.”

🔍 Why it matters: Jesus doesn’t just critique the living—he exposes how they sanitize the dead. He condemns the performance of reverence while ignoring the truth those prophets died for. He calls out the hypocrisy of honoring tombs while silencing conscience.

💬 Charlie Kirk relevance: This verse lands directly on those using Kirk’s death to silence dissent. Trump and his allies are building Kirk’s tomb with censorship, not truth. They claim to honor his legacy while criminalizing the very speech Kirk claimed to defend. If Kirk was a “free speech champion,” then the crackdown on critics is not tribute—it’s betrayal. Jesus would call it cowardice.

📖 Amos 2:1

“Because he burned the bones of the king of Edom to lime, I will not turn away its punishment.”

🔍 Why it matters: God draws a line: physical desecration is condemned, but verbal critique is not. The punishment is for violence against the dead—not for disagreement or satire. This verse affirms that speech is not desecration.

💬 Charlie Kirk relevance: Critics of Kirk—whether they called him a “hate man,” mocked his death, or said “one person killed for gun rights is like chickens coming home to roost”—did not desecrate his body. They spoke. They reacted. They expressed. That is not sin. That is protected speech. The real violation is the state punishing emotion, surveilling dissent, and firing educators for words. God condemns violence—not critique.

📖 Deuteronomy 18:10–12 (for context)

“Let no one be found among you who… consults the dead. Anyone who does these things is detestable to the Lord.”

🔍 Why it matters: Scripture forbids necromancy—not commentary. It warns against summoning the dead for power, not speaking truth about their legacy. The Bible separates spiritual manipulation from moral accountability.

💬 Charlie Kirk relevance: Trump’s use of Kirk’s death to silence critics is closer to necromancy than mourning. It’s a political séance—invoking Kirk’s name to justify censorship, surveillance, and ideological control. That’s not biblical. That’s manipulation.

🧨 Final Thread: Scripture doesn’t protect the dead from critique—it protects the living from false reverence. Jesus rebukes tomb-builders. Amos condemns desecrators. Deuteronomy warns against spiritual manipulation. None of them silence truth-tellers. So when Trump twists Kirk’s death into a weapon against speech, he’s not defending morality—he’s performing power. And the Bible stands with the prophets who spoke anyway.