Page de couverture de Day 19: Mental Imagery For Rehabilitation

Day 19: Mental Imagery For Rehabilitation

Day 19: Mental Imagery For Rehabilitation

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails du balado

À propos de cet audio

 The paper "Mental Imagery and Its Potential for Physical Therapy" by Warner and McNeill (1988) reviewed the existing literature on mental imagery (MI) and mental practice (MP) and their effects on physical skills. The authors aimed to explore the feasibility of these techniques as a supplement to physical therapy. The core premise is that mental processes, particularly imagery, have a tangible influence on physical functions, reflecting a strong mind-body relationship.In 1954, Roger Bannister became the first person to run one mile under four minutes, after which 52 others followed suit the same year. According to pentathlete Marilyn King in a 1985 interview, Bannister had a mental image of being able to surpass the then-existing record, despite "irrefutable" evidence that it was impossible. Olympic champion King trained athletes to utilise Mental Imagery and advocates for a shift in attitude that creates possibilities beyond what individuals think they are capable of. In other words, it is unlikely that one's body will do more than one's mind believes is possible.Mental Imagery can be defined as "cognitively reproducing or visualising an object, scene, or sensation as though it were occurring in overt, physical reality". Mental practice is defined as the "symbolic rehearsal of a physical activity in the absence of any gross muscular movements," achieved through the repetitive use of MI to reach a desired outcome. The paper presents compelling evidence for this mind-body connection as follows;* Perception and Visualisation Similarities: Research by Finke found that mental images exhibit visual properties much like the perception of actual objects, supporting the use of MI for practical purposes like athletic training, which I discussed on Day 17 and Day 18.* Brain Activity Beyond Visual Cortex: Studies using brain electrical activity mapping and positron emission tomography have revealed that mental imaging activates brain areas involved in movement execution (e.g., parietal cortex) in addition to regions involved in visual processing. This suggests MI "mimics actual performance to a greater degree than had been thought previously".* Measurable Muscle Activation: Early electromyography (EMG) studies by Jacobson (1932) demonstrated slight, transitory muscle contractions during MI. While some initial reviews suggested general body activation rather than mirroring specific movement patterns, later research by Harris and Robinson (1986) provided evidence for site-specific muscular activity.Crucially, kinaesthetic imagery, or "visuomotor behavioural rehearsal (VMBR)," which involves mentally recreating the total "feel" of an activity, has been shown to generate EMG activity that matches actual physical performance—we’ve mentioned this before. This muscle activation, in conjunction with Motor Imagery, underscores the direct link.The effectiveness of MI and MP has been extensively studied, particularly in sports and motor learning:* Skill Enhancement: Numerous studies demonstrate that MP can enhance skillfulness. Classic research showed that groups mentally practising basketball free throws or dart throwing improved similarly to those physically practising. More recent studies have replicated these findings.* Cognitive vs. Motor Tasks: Mental practice showed the most pronounced effects and quickest improvement for cognitively oriented tasks (e.g., maze learning, card sorting), while motor skills required more trials and longer sessions for less dramatic improvement.Key variables influencing the successful outcome of MI and MP include:* Vividness and Clarity: Superior results are associated with strong, clear images, which tend to improve with experience and by keeping images simple.* Kinesthetic Imagery: Focusing on the internal "feeling" of the movement, as in VMBR, is critical.* Practice Over Time: Achieving significant results depends on consistently conducting Mental Imagery sessions over time, rather than sporadically or in single instances. A minimum of five sessions, held on separate days, is recommended.* Nondirected Instructions: Allowing subjects to create their own personalised, active mental images is generally more effective than using audiotaped or directed instructions.* Combining Practice Methods: Integrating physical practice (PP) with Mental Practice often leads to the most significant gains in performance.* Positive Outcomes: Visualising successful outcomes and perfect movements also contributes to effectiveness.The paper extends the discussion to health care services, citing evidence for MI's physiological impact:* Cancer Therapy and Psychoneuroimmunology: Mental Imagery has been used to influence immune responses, with patients visualising symbolic ways to fight cancer cells, correlating with increased survival rates and enhanced white blood cell counts.* Biofeedback: Individuals can mentally influence autonomic functions, such as heart rate, muscle tension, and skin temperature, ...

Ce que les auditeurs disent de Day 19: Mental Imagery For Rehabilitation

Moyenne des évaluations de clients

Évaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.

Évaluations sur Audible.ca

Évaluations sur Amazon.ca
Il n'y a pas encore de critiques pour ce titre.