Page de couverture de 'Dog Vs. Cat' & 'Leaving Whitout Notice' & 'Damaged Luxury Car'

'Dog Vs. Cat' & 'Leaving Whitout Notice' & 'Damaged Luxury Car'

'Dog Vs. Cat' & 'Leaving Whitout Notice' & 'Damaged Luxury Car'

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails du balado

À propos de cet audio

 First, the plaintiff says the defendant’s dog attacked his cat, causing a lot of damage that required immediate vet intervention. The plaintiff is suing for the vet bills the defendant refuses to pay. The defendant says it was the plaintiff’s idea to see if the rescue dog would get along with cats, as they were interested in adopting the canine. The defendant is countersuing for defamation of character. Then, the plaintiff rented a space from the defendant, who ended up barging into the unit and disrespecting her privacy whenever she felt like it. The defendant refuses to return her security deposit, and so she’s suing. The defendant claims the plaintiff had left without any notice, and gotten someone else to move in. The place was a disaster, which is why she’s kept the deposit. She is countersuing for unpaid rent. Plus, the plaintiff rents out luxury cars and hired the defendant to take one to a client. The defendant ended up rear-ending another car, causing damage to the vehicle. He started paying off the damage, but then disappeared, so the plaintiff is suing for the rest of the damages. The defendant says the accident was the other driver’s fault, and claims the plaintiff does not have insurance on his vehicles. Don’t forget to rate and subscribe so you never miss an episode. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
Pas encore de commentaire