If Real Estate is Less Risky, Why Do I Have to be Accredited?
Échec de l'ajout au panier.
Échec de l'ajout à la liste d'envies.
Échec de la suppression de la liste d’envies.
Échec du suivi du balado
Ne plus suivre le balado a échoué
If Real Estate is Less Risky, Why Do I Have to be Accredited?
-
Narrateur(s):
-
Auteur(s):
À propos de cet audio
If real estate investing creates less risk than the stock market, why does it require accredited investors?
CORRECTION: Around 23:30 I should be saying Rule 506B; I failed to add the "B" as I was speaking.
Jared discusses this listener question which contains two major assumptions, i.e. 1) real estate investing is less risky and 2) I have to be accredited to invest in it.
Jared explains the wide spectrum of real estate investing risk. Jared then explains what it means to be an accredited investor and why whether accreditation is necessary is unrelated to the level of risk in the investment.
Access all the links and resources from the Biblical Wealth Podcast by visiting https://biblicalwealthsolutions.com/resource-form/
Sign up for a free Biblical Wealth Coaching call by visiting
www.biblicalwealthsolutions.com/freecall
Discover how Compounding Cash Flow™ can help you beat inflation without the stock market risks. Access the video at https://biblicalwealthsolutions.com/video/
Submit your questions to www.biblicalwealthsolutions.com/askjared