Page de couverture de RECONsider... Move Beyond Motor Control with Bill Hartman | Episode #63

RECONsider... Move Beyond Motor Control with Bill Hartman | Episode #63

RECONsider... Move Beyond Motor Control with Bill Hartman | Episode #63

Écouter gratuitement

Voir les détails du balado

À propos de cet audio

Free articles and courses about movement from Bill Hartman at http://uhp.network Episode 63 Overview Chris and Bill critically examine traditional motor control models in movement science, contrasting them with the Unified Health and Performance Continuum (UHPC) model. Their discussion challenges reductionist, brain-centric explanations of movement, advocating instead for an emergent, systems-based perspective that emphasizes adaptability, energy flow, and problem-solving in human movement. The episode is rich with practical analogies, clinical reasoning, and real-world examples to illustrate the limitations of conventional approaches and the strengths of the UHPC framework. Key Topics & Chapter Highlights 00:00 – Introduction The hosts set the stage by questioning the dominance of motor control theories that focus on isolated muscles and sequencing, noting how such approaches oversimplify the complexity of human movement. 01:14 – Critique of Reductionism Chris and Bill discuss how the popularity of brain-as-master-controller models stems from their simplicity and ease of teaching, but argue that this view fails to reflect the true complexity of movement systems. 08:24 – Emergence and Complexity They introduce the concept of movement as an emergent property, referencing Bernstein’s “repetition without repetition” to highlight that no two movements are ever exactly the same. Variability within a healthy range is seen as a sign of robustness, not error. 13:47 – Energy Flow and Gradients The conversation shifts to energy dynamics, with Bill using analogies of fluid flow and gradients to explain how movement is shaped by pressure and energy distribution, not just neural commands. 16:46 – Adaptation as Solution, Not Dysfunction Structural changes like twists or shifts in joints are reframed as adaptive solutions to constraints, rather than failures or dysfunctions. The hosts stress that what appears as “static posture” is actually a constrained, active solution to ongoing physiological challenges. 18:19 – Integrating Tools, Rethinking Reasoning While traditional exercises and techniques aren’t dismissed, Chris and Bill argue that the rationale behind their use matters. The UHPC model seeks to expand movement options and adaptability, rather than just “correcting” isolated problems. 20:47 – Continuum of Health and Performance The hosts explain that health and performance exist on a continuum, often with trade-offs. Optimal performance may require narrowing adaptability, which can increase fragility and risk. 24:10 – Case Example: Knee Pain A practical scenario illustrates how the UHPC model differs from traditional approaches. Instead of focusing on isolated muscle activation, the model looks at how energy is distributed through the system, using observation and experimentation to guide interventions. 32:12 – Observation and Iteration The importance of direct observation and questioning is emphasized. Rather than defaulting to “what can I stretch or strengthen?”, practitioners are encouraged to watch movement in context and look for systemic patterns. 33:53 – Systemic vs. Isolated Solutions The episode concludes by reinforcing that movement is always systemic and emergent, not simply a matter of parts or levers. Adaptations are always solutions to constraints, even if they’re not always optimal. Key Takeaways The UHPC model views movement as an emergent, adaptive behavior shaped by energy flow, constraints, and systemic problem-solving-not just neural control or isolated muscle activation. Variability and adaptability are hallmarks of healthy movement; reductionist models that seek to eliminate variation can increase fragility. Practitioners should focus on expanding movement options and adaptability, using observation, questioning, and experimentation rather than rigid protocols. Structural adaptations are context-dependent solutions, not inherently dysfunctional. Effective clinical reasoning requires moving beyond static anatomical models and embracing complexity, energy dynamics, and the continuum between health and performance. Communication, curiosity, and willingness to question established paradigms are essential for practitioner growth and improved client outcomes. LEARN MORE JOIN the UHP Network to learn directly from Bill through articles, videos and courses. http://UHP.network TRAIN WITH BILL Interested in the only training program based on Bill Hartman’s Model? https://www.reconu.co SUBSCRIBE for even more helpful content: YT: https://www.youtube.com/@BillHartmanPT IG: https://www.instagram.com/bill_hartman_pt/ FB: https://www.facebook.com/BillHartmanPT WEB: https://billhartmanpt.com/ Podcast audio: https://open.spotify.com/show/7cJM6v5S38RLroac6BQjrd?si=eca3b211dafc4202 https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/reconsider-with-bill-hartman/id1662268221 or download with YT Premium

Ce que les auditeurs disent de RECONsider... Move Beyond Motor Control with Bill Hartman | Episode #63

Moyenne des évaluations de clients

Évaluations – Cliquez sur les onglets pour changer la source des évaluations.